On Saturday, May 11, 2024, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> Sat, May 11, 2024, 16:34 David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>
> My plan is to have a v4 out next week, without or without a review of this
>> draft, but then the subsequent few weeks will probably be a bit quiet.
>>
>
> + The cardinal rule, a given
On Sat, May 11, 2024, 16:34 David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 9:00 AM David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 8:44 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Having said that, I reiterate my proposal that we make it a new
>>>
>> under DDL, before 5.2
thout or without a review of this
draft, but then the subsequent few weeks will probably be a bit quiet.
David J.
From bea784bd683f7e022dbfb3d72832d09fc7754913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 07:45:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Document NULL
---
doc/s
future bike-shedding. My next options to decide between are
> the
> > appendix or the lead chapter in Data Types. It really doesn't fit inside
> > DDL IMO which is the only other suggestion I've seen (and an uncertain,
> or
> > at least unsubstantiated, one) and a new chapte
ally doesn't fit inside
> DDL IMO which is the only other suggestion I've seen (and an uncertain, or
> at least unsubstantiated, one) and a new chapter meets both criteria Tom
> laid out, so long as this is framed as more than just having to document
> null values.
I could see goi
out, so long as this is framed as more than just having to document
null values.
> A stylistic note: "null" is an adjective. You can talk about a "null
> value" or a value "is null".
>
Will do.
David J.
On 02.05.24 17:23, David G. Johnston wrote:
Version 2 attached. Still a draft, focused on topic picking and overall
structure. Examples and links planned plus the usual semantic markup stuff.
I chose to add a new sect1 in the user guide (The SQL Language) chapter,
"Data".
Please, let's
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:14 AM jian he wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:47 PM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 08:23 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > > Version 2 attached. Still a draft, focused on topic picking and
> overall structure.
> >
> > I'm fine with most of the
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:47 PM Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 08:23 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > Version 2 attached. Still a draft, focused on topic picking and overall
> > structure.
>
> I'm fine with most of the material (ignoring ellipses and typos), except this:
>
> +
On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 08:23 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Version 2 attached. Still a draft, focused on topic picking and overall
> structure.
I'm fine with most of the material (ignoring ellipses and typos), except this:
+The NOT NULL column constraint is largely syntax sugar for the
Hi David
I reviewed the documentation and it's very detailed.
Thanks
Kashif Zeeshan
Bitnine Global
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 8:24 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 9:47 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> David Rowley writes:
>> > Let's bash it into shape a bit more before going any
ot;David G. Johnston"
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 07:45:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Document NULL
---
doc/src/sgml/data.sgml | 169 +
doc/src/sgml/filelist.sgml | 1 +
doc/src/sgml/postgres.sgml | 1 +
3 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 doc/
David Rowley writes:
> Let's bash it into shape a bit more before going any further on actual
> wording.
FWIW, I want to push back on the idea of making it a tutorial section.
I too considered that, but in the end I think it's a better idea to
put it into the "main" docs, for two reasons:
1. I
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 03:12, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> Attached is a very rough draft attempting this, based on my own thoughts and
> those expressed by Tom in [1], which largely align with mine.
Thanks for picking this up. I agree that we should have something to
improve this.
It would be
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 8:12 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over in [1] it was rediscovered that our documentation assumes the reader
> is familiar with NULL. It seems worthwhile to provide both an introduction
> to the topic and an overview of how this special value gets handled
>
On Wed, May 1, 2024, 16:13 David G. Johnston
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over in [1] it was rediscovered that our documentation assumes the reader
> is familiar with NULL. It seems worthwhile to provide both an introduction
> to the topic and an overview of how this special value gets handled
> throughout
in its own file.
David J.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1859814.1714532025%40sss.pgh.pa.us
From a068247e92e620455a925a0ae746adc225ae1339 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 07:45:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Document NULL
---
doc/src/sgm
17 matches
Mail list logo
