On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:02 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Patch applied back to PG 11.
+Peter E. since I received the following automated note:
> Closed in commitfest 2023-09 with status: Moved to next CF (petere)
Just a note that this patch has been committed (3fea854691), so I have
marked the
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 05:25:44PM -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:52 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 09:21:07PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:13:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:52 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 09:21:07PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:13:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > >> IMO the phrase "open a port" is
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 10:52:10AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 09:21:07PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:13:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> >> IMO the phrase "open a port"
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 09:21:07PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:13:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >> IMO the phrase "open a port" is kind of nonstandard. I think we should say
> >> something along
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:13:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> IMO the phrase "open a port" is kind of nonstandard. I think we should say
>> something along the lines of
>>
>> If listen_addresses is not empty, the server
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for picking this up.
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 03:33:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The default value is > class="systemname">localhost,
> > which allows only local TCP/IP loopback
> >
Thanks for picking this up.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 03:33:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The default value is class="systemname">localhost,
> which allows only local TCP/IP loopback connections
> to be
> - made. While client authentication ( + made. If
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:57:45PM -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:59 PM Nathan Bossart
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 03:17:21PM -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > > If listen_addresses is empty, then server won't try to open any TCP/IP
> > > ports. The patch does not
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:48 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:11:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > There is certainly an argument that such a condition indicates that
> > something's very broken in our configuration and we should complain.
> > But I'm not sure how exciting
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:11:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kyotaro Horiguchi writes:
> > If I had to say, I would feel it rather surprising if server
> > successfully starts even when any explicitly-specified port can't be
> > opened (which is the current case).
>
> There is certainly an
Kyotaro Horiguchi writes:
> If I had to say, I would feel it rather surprising if server
> successfully starts even when any explicitly-specified port can't be
> opened (which is the current case).
There is certainly an argument that such a condition indicates that
something's very broken in our
At Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:38:14 -0700, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:28:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Nathan Bossart writes:
> >> Before we spend too much time trying to document the current behavior, I
> >> think we should see if we can change it to something less
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:28:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart writes:
>> Before we spend too much time trying to document the current behavior, I
>> think we should see if we can change it to something less surprising (i.e.,
>> failing to start if the server fails for any address).
Nathan Bossart writes:
> Before we spend too much time trying to document the current behavior, I
> think we should see if we can change it to something less surprising (i.e.,
> failing to start if the server fails for any address). The original
> objections around kernel support for IPv6 might
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:57:45PM -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> Perhaps we can prefix that statement with "If listen_addresses is not
> empty", like so:
Before we spend too much time trying to document the current behavior, I
think we should see if we can change it to something less surprising
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:59 PM Nathan Bossart
wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 03:17:21PM -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > If listen_addresses is empty, then server won't try to open any TCP/IP
> > ports. The patch does not change any language related to that.
>
> Your proposed change notes that
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 03:17:21PM -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> Upon further testing, I saw that server will not start only if it is
> unable to open the port on _all_ the interfaces/addresses. It it's
> able to open the port on at least one, the server will start.
This surprised me. I would've
The attached patch clarifies that the server will start even if it is
unable to open the port on some of the TCP/IP addresses listed (or
implied by a value of '*' or localhost) in listen_addresses parameter.
I think it is important to call this out, because I was surprised to
see that the server
19 matches
Mail list logo
