Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-02-08 Thread Peter Smith
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:47 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 23.01.24 02:06, Peter Smith wrote: > > This has been working forever, but seems to have broken due to commit > > [1] having an undeclared variable. > > > runtime error: file stylesheet-html-common.xsl line 452 element if > > Variable

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-02-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 23.01.24 02:06, Peter Smith wrote: This has been working forever, but seems to have broken due to commit [1] having an undeclared variable. runtime error: file stylesheet-html-common.xsl line 452 element if Variable 'autolink.index.see' has not been declared. make: *** [html-stamp] Error

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-29 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Smith writes: >> IIUC these releases notes [1] say autolink.index.see existed since >> v1.79.1, but unfortunately, that is more recent than my ancient >> installed v1.78.1 > Is anything going to be changed for this? I assume Peter E. is going to address it, but FOSDEM is this week and so

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-29 Thread Peter Smith
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:12 AM Peter Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:32 PM Peter Smith wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > > Peter Smith writes: > > > > I usually the HTML documentation locally using command: > > > > make STYLE=website html >

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-24 Thread Peter Smith
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:32 PM Peter Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Peter Smith writes: > > > I usually the HTML documentation locally using command: > > > make STYLE=website html > > > This has been working forever, but seems to have broken due to

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-22 Thread Peter Smith
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Smith writes: > > I usually the HTML documentation locally using command: > > make STYLE=website html > > This has been working forever, but seems to have broken due to commit > > [1] having an undeclared variable. > > Interestingly,

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Smith writes: > I usually the HTML documentation locally using command: > make STYLE=website html > This has been working forever, but seems to have broken due to commit > [1] having an undeclared variable. Interestingly, that still works fine for me, on RHEL8 with

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-22 Thread Peter Smith
Hi, I usually the HTML documentation locally using command: make STYLE=website html ~ This has been working forever, but seems to have broken due to commit [1] having an undeclared variable. e.g. [postgres@CentOS7-x64 sgml]$ make STYLE=website html { \ echo ""; \ echo ""; \ } >

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 20.01.24 23:59, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut writes: On 20.01.24 17:03, Tom Lane wrote: * I gather that the point here is to change some generated anchor tags. Would any of these tags be things people would be likely to have bookmarked? No, because the problem is that the anchor

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-20 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 20.01.24 17:03, Tom Lane wrote: >> * I gather that the point here is to change some generated anchor >> tags. Would any of these tags be things people would be likely >> to have bookmarked? > No, because the problem is that the anchor names are randomly generated

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 20.01.24 17:03, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut writes: I think there was general agreement with what this patch is doing, but I guess it's too boring to actually review the patch in detail. Let's say, if there are no objections, I'll go ahead and commit it. I re-read the thread and

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-20 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > I think there was general agreement with what this patch is doing, but I > guess it's too boring to actually review the patch in detail. Let's > say, if there are no objections, I'll go ahead and commit it. I re-read the thread and have two thoughts: * We worried

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 20.01.24 03:33, vignesh C wrote: On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 01:23, Tristan Partin wrote: On Thu Aug 24, 2023 at 2:30 PM CDT, Tom Lane wrote: "Tristan Partin" writes: On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 2:24 PM CDT, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Somewhere at PGCon, I forgot exactly where, maybe in the same

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2024-01-19 Thread vignesh C
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 01:23, Tristan Partin wrote: > > On Thu Aug 24, 2023 at 2:30 PM CDT, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Tristan Partin" writes: > > > On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 2:24 PM CDT, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > >> Somewhere at PGCon, I forgot exactly where, maybe in the same meeting > > >> where we

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2023-08-24 Thread Tristan Partin
On Thu Aug 24, 2023 at 2:30 PM CDT, Tom Lane wrote: "Tristan Partin" writes: > On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 2:24 PM CDT, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Somewhere at PGCon, I forgot exactly where, maybe in the same meeting >> where we talked about getting rid of distprep, we talked about that the >>

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2023-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Tristan Partin" writes: > On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 2:24 PM CDT, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Somewhere at PGCon, I forgot exactly where, maybe in the same meeting >> where we talked about getting rid of distprep, we talked about that the >> documentation builds are not reproducible (in the sense

Re: Make documentation builds reproducible

2023-08-24 Thread Tristan Partin
On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 2:24 PM CDT, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Somewhere at PGCon, I forgot exactly where, maybe in the same meeting where we talked about getting rid of distprep, we talked about that the documentation builds are not reproducible (in the sense of

Make documentation builds reproducible

2023-08-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
. (See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInPDFGeneratedByApacheFOP.)From 9f2c7262445b6868c1d2c9f2d75ac1153b7c2a64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 16:38:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Make documentation builds reproducible --- doc/src/sgml