On 25/12/2023 18:36, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 7:24 PM Andrei Lepikhov
wrote:
On 22/12/2023 11:48, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Because we must trust all predictions made by the planner, we just
> choose the most trustworthy path. According to the planner logic, it
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 7:24 PM Andrei Lepikhov
wrote:
> On 22/12/2023 11:48, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > Because we must trust all predictions made by the planner, we just
> > > choose the most trustworthy path. According to the planner logic, it is
> > > a path with a smaller
On 22/12/2023 11:48, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Because we must trust all predictions made by the planner, we just
> choose the most trustworthy path. According to the planner logic, it is
> a path with a smaller selectivity. We can make mistakes anyway just
> because of the nature of
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 8:53 AM Andrei Lepikhov
wrote:
> On 21/12/2023 12:10, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > I took a closer look at the patch in [9]. I should drop my argument
> > about breaking the model, because add_path() already considers other
> > aspects than just costs. But I have two
On 21/12/2023 12:10, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I took a closer look at the patch in [9]. I should drop my argument
> about breaking the model, because add_path() already considers other
> aspects than just costs. But I have two more note about that patch:
>
> 1) It seems that you're
