Here is another rebase over 3af7040985. Nothing else has changed.
Thanks
Richard
v4-0001-Retiring-is_pushed_down.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 8:37 PM vignesh C wrote:
> I'm seeing that there has been no activity in this thread for nearly 6
> months, I'm planning to close this in the current commitfest unless
> someone is planning to take it forward. It can be opened again when
> there is more interest.
I'm
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 08:25, Richard Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:39 PM Richard Guo wrote:
>>
>> * This patch calculates the outer join relids that are being formed
>> generally in this way:
>>
>> bms_difference(joinrelids, bms_union(outerrelids, innerrelids))
>>
>> Of course
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:39 PM Richard Guo wrote:
> * This patch calculates the outer join relids that are being formed
> generally in this way:
>
> bms_difference(joinrelids, bms_union(outerrelids, innerrelids))
>
> Of course this can only be used after the outer join relids has been
>
When forming an outer join's joinrel, we have the is_pushed_down flag in
RestrictInfo nodes to distinguish those quals that are in that join's
JOIN/ON condition from those that were pushed down to the joinrel and
thus act as filter quals. Since now we have the outer-join-aware-Var
infrastructure,
