On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 06:40, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM David Steele wrote:
> > On 2/16/19 10:38 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > Thanks for looking at this. FYI, I did not originally write this,
> rather
> > > the original author has not replied to requests.
> > > JDBC
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM David Steele wrote:
> On 2/16/19 10:38 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Thanks for looking at this. FYI, I did not originally write this, rather
> > the original author has not replied to requests.
> > JDBC could use this, I assume others could as well.
> >
> > That said
On 2/16/19 10:38 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
Thanks for looking at this. FYI, I did not originally write this, rather
the original author has not replied to requests.
JDBC could use this, I assume others could as well.
That said I'm certainly open to suggestions on how to do this.
Craig, do you
Andres,
Thanks for looking at this. FYI, I did not originally write this, rather
the original author has not replied to requests.
JDBC could use this, I assume others could as well.
That said I'm certainly open to suggestions on how to do this.
Craig, do you have any other ideas?
Dave Cramer
Hi,
On 2018-12-03 06:38:43 -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> From 4d023cfc1fed0b5852b4da1aad6a32549b03ce26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dave Cramer
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:23:49 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Respect client initiated CopyDone in walsender
>
> ---
>
Dave Cramer
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 07:53, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 23:19, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 19:38, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Dmitry,
>>>
>>> Please see attached rebased patches
>>>
>>
>> I'm fine with patch 0001, though I
Dave Cramer
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 23:19, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 19:38, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Dmitry,
>>
>> Please see attached rebased patches
>>
>
> I'm fine with patch 0001, though I find this comment a bit hard to follow:
>
> + * The send_data callback must enqueue
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 19:38, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> Please see attached rebased patches
>
I'm fine with patch 0001, though I find this comment a bit hard to follow:
+ * The send_data callback must enqueue complete CopyData messages to libpq
+ * using pq_putmessage_noblock or similar,
Dmitry,
Please see attached rebased patches
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:52, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:49 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I have done a preliminary check and it seems pretty
> straightforward.
> >
> > I will clean
>On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:49 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Thanks, I have done a preliminary check and it seems pretty straightforward.
>
> I will clean it up for Monday
Great, thank you!
Dmitry,
Thanks, I have done a preliminary check and it seems pretty straightforward.
I will clean it up for Monday
Thanks for your patience!
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:22, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:17 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> >
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:17 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Why is this being closed? I did not see the first email looking for
> clarification.
Well, mostly due total absence of response and broken mind reading crystal ball.
> I can certainly rebase it.
Yes, please do. I'll change the CF item
Why is this being closed? I did not see the first email looking for
clarification.
The history is the original author dropped off the planet (no idea where he
is)
I can certainly rebase it.
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:00, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:58 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > Back in 2016 a patch was proposed that seems to have died on the vine. See
> >
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Back in 2016 a patch was proposed that seems to have died on the vine. See
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/cafgjrd3hdyoa33m69tbeofnner2bzbwa8ffjt2v5vfztbvu...@mail.gmail.com
> for the history and
Back in 2016 a patch was proposed that seems to have died on the vine. See
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/cafgjrd3hdyoa33m69tbeofnner2bzbwa8ffjt2v5vfztbvu...@mail.gmail.com
for the history and https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/621/ for the
commitfest entry.
I've rebased the
16 matches
Mail list logo
