Re: Some deleted GUCs are still referred to

2023-11-13 Thread Peter Smith
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > On 9 Nov 2023, at 00:51, Peter Smith wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and > > "max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files > > (from the REL_16_1 source zip) > >

Re: Some deleted GUCs are still referred to

2023-11-09 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 9 Nov 2023, at 00:51, Peter Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and > "max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files > (from the REL_16_1 source zip) > > src\backend\po\fr.po > src\backend\po\tr.po > > ~~ > > Should those

Some deleted GUCs are still referred to

2023-11-08 Thread Peter Smith
Hi, I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and "max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files (from the REL_16_1 source zip) src\backend\po\fr.po src\backend\po\tr.po ~~ Should those be removed? There was a commit [1] that said these all traces of those