On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:27 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > And pushed! I think an improvement in CI times of this degree is pretty
> > awesome.
>
> +1
>
> A lot of CI compute time is saved. The Cirrus account[1] was
> previously hitting the 4
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:57 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> And pushed! I think an improvement in CI times of this degree is pretty
> awesome.
+1
A lot of CI compute time is saved. The Cirrus account[1] was
previously hitting the 4 job limit all day long, and now it's often
running 1 or 2 jobs when
Hi,
On 2023-02-02 17:47:37 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 3:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Yea, there's a problem where packer on windows doesn't seem to abort after a
> > powershell script error out. The reason isn't yet quiete clear. I think
> > Bilal
> > is working on a
Hi,
On 1/12/2023 3:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Yea, there's a problem where packer on windows doesn't seem to abort after a
powershell script error out. The reason isn't yet quiete clear. I think Bilal
is working on a workaround.
That should be fixed now. Also, adding a patch for PG15.
Hi,
On 2023-01-11 17:21:21 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:20:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is attached.
> > Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these container images
>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:20:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is attached.
> Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these container images
> are needs to get pulled on every CI run, also they are slow to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:20 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-01-10 09:22:12 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > There is more than 2x speed gain when VMs are used.
> >
> > One consideration is that if windows runs twice as fast, we'll suddenly
> > start using twice as many resources at
Hi,
On 2023-01-10 09:22:12 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > There is more than 2x speed gain when VMs are used.
>
> One consideration is that if windows runs twice as fast, we'll suddenly
> start using twice as many resources at cirrus/google/amazon - the
> windows task has been throttling
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:20:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is attached.
> Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these container images
> are needs to get pulled on every CI run, also they are slow to
Hi,
It didn't work again. Sending numbers until I figure out how to solve this.
Scheduling Step:
VM + VS 2019: 00.17m
Container + VS 2019: 03.51m
VM + MinGW64: 00.16m
Container + MinGW64: 04.28m
Execution step:
VM + VS 2019: 12.16m
Container + VS 2019: 26.02m
VM + MinGW64: 07.55m
Hi,
Tables didn't seem nice on web interface. Re-sending with correct
formatting.
Scheduling step:
| VS 2019 | MinGW64
--
VM | 00:17m | 00:16m
--
Container | 03:51m |
Hi,
I propose using windows VMs instead of containers, the patch is
attached. Currently, windows containers are used on the CI, but these
container images are needs to get pulled on every CI run, also they are
slow to run.
These VM images are created in the same way how container images are
12 matches
Mail list logo
