On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dave Cramer writes:
>>> So it seems this patch is being ignored in this thread.
>>
>> Well, Jonathan did kind of hijack what appears to be a thread about
>> documentation (with
> On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Dave Cramer writes:
>> So it seems this patch is being ignored in this thread.
>
> Well, Jonathan did kind of hijack what appears to be a thread about
> documentation (with an already-committed fix).
I apologize if it was interpreted as
Dave Cramer writes:
> So it seems this patch is being ignored in this thread.
Well, Jonathan did kind of hijack what appears to be a thread about
documentation (with an already-committed fix).
I'd suggest reposting that patch in its own thread and adding it to
the next CF.
Jonathan's patch seems like a good idea to me from a user POV, but then
I just showed up the other day so I don't really have anything of
substance to add.
On 8/17/18 9:08 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 18:27, Jonathan S. Katz
Dave Cramer
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 18:27, Jonathan S. Katz <
jonathan.k...@excoventures.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2018, at 1:05 AM, Jonathan S. Katz <
> jonathan.k...@excoventures.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:06:34PM
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:36:29AM -0400, Dian Fay wrote:
> Fair enough! Here's a new version.
Thanks, pushed. Instead of putting the new sentence in the "Notes"
section, I have added it in the "Description" section, which is more
consistent with other commands, like DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW, etc.
> On Aug 16, 2018, at 1:05 AM, Jonathan S. Katz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:06:34PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> I played around with this feature a bit and did see this was the case.
>>> Also while playing
Fair enough! Here's a new version.
On 8/16/18 12:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dian Fay writes:
I feel resorting to the infinitive asks more involvement of the reader,
while leading with the responsible role(s) helps shortcut the process of
determining whether what follows is relevant. Efficiency
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:06:34PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> I played around with this feature a bit and did see this was the case.
>> Also while playing around I noticed the error message was as such:
>>
>> test=> REFRESH
Dian Fay writes:
> I feel resorting to the infinitive asks more involvement of the reader,
> while leading with the responsible role(s) helps shortcut the process of
> determining whether what follows is relevant. Efficiency is always a
> virtue, although this is admittedly more than a little
I feel resorting to the infinitive asks more involvement of the reader,
while leading with the responsible role(s) helps shortcut the process of
determining whether what follows is relevant. Efficiency is always a
virtue, although this is admittedly more than a little academic for a
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:06:34PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> I played around with this feature a bit and did see this was the case.
> Also while playing around I noticed the error message was as such:
>
> test=> REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW blah;
> ERROR: must be owner of relation
Hi Dian,
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 7:46 PM, Dian Fay wrote:
>
> hi all! I discovered today that the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW documentation
> doesn't mention that only the owner (or a superuser) may actually perform the
> refresh operation. This patch adds a note to that effect.
I played around
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:46:49PM -0400, Dian Fay wrote:
> hi all! I discovered today that the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW documentation
> doesn't mention that only the owner (or a superuser) may actually perform
> the refresh operation. This patch adds a note to that effect.
I think that's a good
hi all! I discovered today that the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
documentation doesn't mention that only the owner (or a superuser) may
actually perform the refresh operation. This patch adds a note to that
effect.
Dian Fay
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/refresh_materialized_view.sgml
15 matches
Mail list logo
