> On 6 Apr 2023, at 18:39, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> *If* you wanted to do something to fix this, you could create a key
> called files_to_remove_after_loading, and run unlink on those files
> rather than running a shell command. Or maybe just remove the file
> unconditionally at the start of the
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:16:16AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 3/9/23 19:00, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > On 3/9/23 01:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >>> IMO we should fix that. We have a bunch of buildfarm members running on
> >>>
On 3/14/23 11:34, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Tomas Vondra
>> and I don't think there's a good place to inject the 'rm' so I ended up
>> adding a 'cleanup_cmd' right after 'compress_cmd'. But it seems a bit
>> strange / hacky. Maybe there's a better way?
>
> Does the file need to be removed at
Re: Tomas Vondra
> and I don't think there's a good place to inject the 'rm' so I ended up
> adding a 'cleanup_cmd' right after 'compress_cmd'. But it seems a bit
> strange / hacky. Maybe there's a better way?
Does the file need to be removed at all? Could we leave it there and
have "make clean"
On 3/9/23 19:00, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>
> On 3/9/23 01:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> IMO we should fix that. We have a bunch of buildfarm members running on
>>> Ubuntu 18.04 (or older) - it's true none of them seems to be
On 3/9/23 01:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> IMO we should fix that. We have a bunch of buildfarm members running on
>> Ubuntu 18.04 (or older) - it's true none of them seems to be running TAP
>> tests. But considering how trivial
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> IMO we should fix that. We have a bunch of buildfarm members running on
> Ubuntu 18.04 (or older) - it's true none of them seems to be running TAP
> tests. But considering how trivial the fix is ...
>
> Barring objections, I'll push
On 3/8/23 20:20, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 8 Mar 2023, at 18:55, Christoph Berg wrote:
>
>> 18.04 will be EOL in a few weeks so it might be ok to just say it's
>> not supported, but removing the input file manually after calling lz4
>> would be an easy fix.
>
> Is it reasonable to expect
> On 8 Mar 2023, at 18:55, Christoph Berg wrote:
> 18.04 will be EOL in a few weeks so it might be ok to just say it's
> not supported, but removing the input file manually after calling lz4
> would be an easy fix.
Is it reasonable to expect that this version of LZ4 can/will appear on any
other
Re: Tomas Vondra
> Add LZ4 compression to pg_dump
This broke the TAP tests on Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic):
[17:06:45.513](0.000s) ok 1927 - compression_lz4_custom: should not dump
test_table with 4-row INSERTs
# Running: pg_dump --jobs=2 --format=directory --compress=lz4:1
10 matches
Mail list logo