On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 18:30, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> [ moving to pghackers for wider visibility ]
>
> Dean Rasheed writes:
> > On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 16:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> In general, I'm disturbed that we just threw away the previous
> >> promise that numeric multiplication results were
[ moving to pghackers for wider visibility ]
Dean Rasheed writes:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 16:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In general, I'm disturbed that we just threw away the previous
>> promise that numeric multiplication results were exact. That
>> seems like a pretty fundamental property ---
