Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage

2022-11-22 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2022-10-03 00:42:27 +0900, Dong Wook Lee wrote: > > Which indeed is the case, e.g. on 32bit systems it fails: > > > > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4619535222308864?logs=test_world_32#L253 > > > >

Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage

2022-10-02 Thread Dong Wook Lee
> Which indeed is the case, e.g. on 32bit systems it fails: > > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4619535222308864?logs=test_world_32#L253 > > https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4619535222308864/testrun/build-32/testrun/pgstattuple/regress/regression.diffs > > table_len | tuple_count |

Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage

2022-10-02 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2022-08-03 11:19:59 +0900, Dong Wook Lee wrote: > Is there no problem with selecting all the columns during SELECT statements? > I thought there might be a problem where the test results could change easily. Which indeed is the case, e.g. on 32bit systems it fails:

Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage

2022-08-02 Thread Dong Wook Lee
Tom Lane writes: > I do not think it's a great idea to create random dependencies > between modules like the pgstattuple -> bloom dependency you > casually added here. I agree with your option. Is there no problem with selecting all the columns during SELECT statements? I thought there might be

Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage

2022-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
Dong Wook Lee writes: > Hi, hackers > I added some SQL statements to improve test coverage. I do not think it's a great idea to create random dependencies between modules like the pgstattuple -> bloom dependency you casually added here. regards, tom lane

pgstattuple: add test for coverage

2022-08-01 Thread Dong Wook Lee
Hi, hackers I added some SQL statements to improve test coverage. As data was inserted, the expected file changed. So should I change all `select *` for a stable expected result? And it's the coverage change as I add 50.6% -> 78.7% --- regards, Lee Dong Wook v1_add_test_pgstattuple.patch