On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 4:09 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 07:37:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > No objections here.
>
> Done as of cae6fc2.
Thank you.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 07:37:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> No objections here.
Done as of cae6fc2.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:18:21PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Patch updated. Given the new text, I thought it might be better to
> move the paragraph right next to the description of the ResourceOwner
> API at the beginning of the section, because the context seems clearer
> that way.
Thanks for looking.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:44:11PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > It seems a bunch of other object/resource types have been integrated
> > into the resowner mechanism since the list was last updated (2008).
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:44:11PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> It seems a bunch of other object/resource types have been integrated
> into the resowner mechanism since the list was last updated (2008).
>
> Attached patch updates the list. Not sure though if we should keep
> the current format
Hi,
I was reading src/backend/utils/resowner/README today and noticed the
following paragraph that mentions the types of objects/resources
*directly* supported by the module.
===
Currently, ResourceOwners contain direct support for recording ownership of
buffer pins, lmgr locks, and catcache,
