On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:03:22PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 09:33:19AM +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> I think this is good to go.
>
> Thanks. In v4, I've added a first draft of the commit messages, and I am
> planning to commit this early next week.
Committed.
--
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 09:33:19AM +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> If I'm nitpicking, "[--verbose | -v]" in the clusterdb synopsis should
> be replaced with "[option...]", like the other commands, because there
> are other general-purpose options like --quiet and --echo.
Good catch. I fixed that in
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 22:22, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking a look. I updated the synopsis sections in v3.
OK, that looks good. The vacuumdb synopsis in particular looks a lot
better now that "-N | --exclude-schema" is on its own line, because it
was hard to read previously, and
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:20:13PM +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> I'm not sure how useful these changes are, but I don't really object.
> You need to update the synopsis section of the docs though.
Thanks for taking a look. I updated the synopsis sections in v3.
I also spent some more time on the
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 02:22, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> I saw that this thread was referenced elsewhere [0], so I figured I'd take
> a fresh look. From a quick glance, I'd say 0001 and 0002 are pretty
> reasonable and could probably be committed for v17.
>
I'm not sure how useful these changes
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> rebased
I saw that this thread was referenced elsewhere [0], so I figured I'd take
a fresh look. From a quick glance, I'd say 0001 and 0002 are pretty
reasonable and could probably be committed for v17. 0003 probably requires
rebased
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
>From 9618c243cbd3056006acda0136036b432af37830 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:12:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] vacuumdb: allow specifying tables or schemas to
process in all
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:05:17PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:56:38 -0700, Nathan Bossart
> wrote in
>> Sorry, I'm not following. I intentionally avoided allowing combinations of
>> --schema and --table in the patches I sent. This is the current behavior
>> of
At Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:56:38 -0700, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:16:26PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:24:02 -0700, Nathan Bossart
> > wrote in
> >> I debated also allowing users to specify different types of
Thanks for taking a look.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:16:26PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:24:02 -0700, Nathan Bossart
> wrote in
>> I debated also allowing users to specify different types of objects in the
>> same command (e.g., "vacuumdb --schema myschema --table
At Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:24:02 -0700, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> While working on some other patches, I found myself wanting to use the
> following command to vacuum the catalogs in all databases in a cluster:
>
> vacuumdb --all --schema pg_catalog
>
> However, this presently fails with
While working on some other patches, I found myself wanting to use the
following command to vacuum the catalogs in all databases in a cluster:
vacuumdb --all --schema pg_catalog
However, this presently fails with the following error:
cannot vacuum specific schema(s) in all
12 matches
Mail list logo
