Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 11:58 +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> This should overflow, since the correct result (+9223372036854775808)
>> is out of range. However, on platforms without integer overflow
>> builtins or 128-bit integers, pg_sub_s64_overflow() does the
>> following:
On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 11:58 +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> One of the new tests in the infinite interval patch has revealed a bug
> in our 64-bit integer subtraction code. Consider the following:
>
> select 0::int8 - '-9223372036854775808'::int8;
>
> This should overflow, since the correct result
One of the new tests in the infinite interval patch has revealed a bug
in our 64-bit integer subtraction code. Consider the following:
select 0::int8 - '-9223372036854775808'::int8;
This should overflow, since the correct result (+9223372036854775808)
is out of range. However, on platforms
