On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 13:19 +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> What I'm most worried about now is that there are other areas of
> functionality like that, that I'm overlooking, and which will
> interact
> with this feature in non-trivial ways.
Agreed. I'm not sure exactly how we'd find those other
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 07:47, Jeff Davis wrote:
>
> This isn't a complete review, but I spent a while looking at this, and
> it looks like it's in good shape.
Thanks for looking.
> I like the syntax, and I think the solution for renaming the alias
> ("RETURNING WITH (new as n, old as o)") is a
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 18:49 +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 14:04, Dean Rasheed
> wrote:
> >
> > v7 patch attached, with those updates.
> >
>
> Rebased version attached, forced by 87985cc925.
This isn't a complete review, but I spent a while looking at this, and
it looks
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:48 PM Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 18:21, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >
> > Updated version attached tidying up a couple of things and fixing another
> > bug:
> >
>
> Rebased version attached, on top of c649fa24a4 (MERGE ... RETURNING support).
>
hi, some
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 3:53 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
>
> Attached is a new patch, now with docs (no other code changes).
>
Hi,
some issues I found, while playing around with
support-returning-old-new-v2.patch
doc/src/sgml/ref/update.sgml:
[ RETURNING [ WITH ( { OLD | NEW } AS output_alias
On 12/4/23 13:14, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> I have been playing around with the idea of adding support for OLD/NEW
> to RETURNING, partly motivated by the discussion on the MERGE
> RETURNING thread [1], but also because I think it would be a very
> useful addition for other comm
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 8:15 PM Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> I have been playing around with the idea of adding support for OLD/NEW
> to RETURNING, partly motivated by the discussion on the MERGE
> RETURNING thread [1], but also because I think it would be a very
> useful addition for
I have been playing around with the idea of adding support for OLD/NEW
to RETURNING, partly motivated by the discussion on the MERGE
RETURNING thread [1], but also because I think it would be a very
useful addition for other commands (UPDATE in particular).
This was discussed a long time ago [2
