Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
path is
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:50:01AM +0800, hom wrote:
I trace into scan.c because I want to known how the paser tree is
built and I debug the source step by step.
Then the eclipse pick up the scan.I and the excute order does not
match the code.
Umm, the scanners produced by flex and bison are
2011/3/20 hom obsidian...@gmail.com:
I trace into scan.c because I want to known how the paser tree is
built and I debug the source step by step.
I suggest you learn how flex/bison work first. The contents of the *.c
files generated by flex/bison are not generally supposed to be
interpreted by
On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
then the phase2 of the
On 2011-03-20 05:44, Robert Haas wrote:
Hmm, I'm not going to be able to reproduce this here, and my test
setup didn't show a clear regression. I can try beating on it some
more, but... Any chance you could rerun your test with the latest
master-branch code, and perhaps also with the patch I
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:11, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Example #4: PK is period, FK is timestamp. FK must be contained in some
PK period.
CREATE TABLE pk (a period PRIMARY KEY, ...);
CREATE TABLE fk (x timestamp REFERENCES pk (a), ...);
As above, we can probably arrange
2011/3/20 Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:50:01AM +0800, hom wrote:
I trace into scan.c because I want to known how the paser tree is
built and I debug the source step by step.
Then the eclipse pick up the scan.I and the excute order does not
match the
2011/3/20 Nicolas Barbier nicolas.barb...@gmail.com:
2011/3/20 hom obsidian...@gmail.com:
I trace into scan.c because I want to known how the paser tree is
built and I debug the source step by step.
I suggest you learn how flex/bison work first. The contents of the *.c
files generated by
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:40:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
(2) Allow collations to propagate up through nodes that deliver
noncollatable outputs.
I don't think this is the goal. Only strings types are collatable, as
you point out.
* Something like
row('a' collate C, 'b' collate en_US)
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:22:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Attached is a WIP patch to split the expression-tree representation of
collations into separate fields for input and output collation, and to
replace the parser's current method of assigning collations with a
recursive post-pass. I
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:11, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Example #4: PK is period, FK is timestamp. FK must be contained in some
PK period.
CREATE TABLE pk (a period PRIMARY KEY, ...);
CREATE TABLE fk (x timestamp REFERENCES pk (a), ...);
As above, we can probably arrange
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:36:14AM +, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
maybe we should change the 1000 digits here:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-NUMERIC-DECIMAL
because ISTM that up to 2^17 digits are supported (which makes more
sense than
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-03-20 05:44, Robert Haas wrote:
Hmm, I'm not going to be able to reproduce this here, and my test
setup didn't show a clear regression. I can try beating on it some
more, but... Any chance you could rerun your
On 20 March 2011 23:40, Jan Urbański wulc...@wulczer.org wrote:
I'll update the commitfest app for the 2011-Next commitfest, but if
someone would like to pick this up and include it in the 9.1 PL/Python
revamp pack, I'd be thrilled.
I would also be thrilled. I definitely share your sense of
Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org writes:
I've looked over the main code and it looks good. While I'm not totally
conviced it has to be done as a seperate pass, this way is exceedingly
readable and clear as to what is going on, which makes me much more
confident of its correctness.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Keep in mind that the datetime stuff was abandoned by the maintainer
some years ago with quite
16 matches
Mail list logo
