[HACKERS] porting from 7.2 - 7.4

2003-12-02 Thread bpalmer
I'm trying to port some replication code from 7.2 - 7.4 and am running into a block. In the file: /src/backend/tcop/postgres.c My diff was for: void pg_exec_query(char *query_string) { pg_exec_query_string(query_string, whereToSendOutput, QueryContext); } But the

Re: [HACKERS] We're finally there ...

2003-11-16 Thread bpalmer
'k, I just tag'd REL7_4 and built the bundles ... the files are available under ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.4beta, and I've open'd up the ftp server there to 100 connections so that ppl can get in and test it ... ftp3.us.postgresql.org is in sync as well if anyone is interested.

[HACKERS] source version?

2003-11-15 Thread bpalmer
No luck on general, so I'll try here: I'm trying to figure out what version of a source code I have. I know it's a 7.2 release, but how can I find out of it's 7.2, 7.2.3, 7.2.4, etc. FROM THE SOURCE CODE, not from compiling (it doesn't compile, it's testing code). Thanks - Brandon

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist

2002-11-30 Thread bpalmer
* Compliant ADD COLUMN I've missed the thread (if there was one), how is it non-compliant? Thanks, - Brandon c: 917-697-8665h: 201-798-4983 b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Wishlist for 7.4: Plan stability

2002-11-30 Thread bpalmer
Is someone keeping a hopeful todo list? - Brandon c: 917-697-8665h: 201-798-4983 b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp:crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32 sources

2002-11-26 Thread bpalmer
D'Arcy, In production the database servers are seperate multi-processor machines with mirrored disks linked via Gigabit ethernet to the app server. In development I have people extremely familiar with MS, but not very hot with Unix in any flavour, who are developing Java and PHP code

Re: [HACKERS] 7.3 schedule

2002-04-11 Thread bpalmer
We'll need a good beta period this time, because of: I know it's a sore subject, but how about ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN this time around? I've been hearing about it for years now. :) - brandon c: 646-456-5455

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2b1 ...

2001-10-27 Thread bpalmer
Is there some formal place to make comments on how 7.2b1 works? I'm about to run it through it's paces on OBSD. Or is this just a 'it's broked' testing time? - Brandon c: 646-456-5455

Re: [HACKERS] autoconf taking forever?

2001-10-24 Thread bpalmer
I'm working on making some changes to the top level configure.in and m4 has now been running for 17 minutes on a 1.4G tbird. Am I missing something or is this know to take forever? For me, the autoconf run is instantaneous. Make sure you're using Autoconf 2.13, and you don't have

[HACKERS] autoconf taking forever?

2001-10-17 Thread bpalmer
I'm working on making some changes to the top level configure.in and m4 has now been running for 17 minutes on a 1.4G tbird. Am I missing something or is this know to take forever? Thanks guys, - Brandon c:

[HACKERS] Why are ftp mirrors out of sync?

2001-10-16 Thread bpalmer
You can find a snapshot that should be pretty durn close to 7.2beta1 at ftp://ftp2.us.postgresql.org/pub/dev/postgresql-snapshot.tar.gz (note that at last word, other mirrors were not up to date --- if the doc/TODO file doesn't contain a date in October, it's stale). I think the only thing

Re: [HACKERS] Replication

2001-10-16 Thread bpalmer
I've been looking for documents and other info on replication efforts in PostgreSQL. If anyone here can point me to places where I can find these, it would be really appreciated. It really depends on your replication needs. I would suggest taking a look at gborg.postgresql.org for any of the

Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes

2001-09-23 Thread bpalmer
Since there have been drastic CVS changes, the web page doc should REALLY be updated... Withdrawn, I notive Bruce made the changes, but I guess they havn't hit yet. My bad. - Brandon c: 646-456-5455

[HACKERS] LOCAL_CREDS - SCM_CREDS in src/backend/libpq/auth.c:535

2001-09-23 Thread bpalmer
For OpenBSD to work, we need a change from LOCAL_CREDS to SCM_CREDS. Bruce, I think you are familure with this one. Care to make the change? (I have no idea where to make it!). Thanks all, - Brandon c:

[HACKERS] CVS changes

2001-09-23 Thread bpalmer
Since there have been drastic CVS changes, the web page doc should REALLY be updated... http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/cvs.html - Brandon c: 646-456-5455

Re: [HACKERS] backend hba.c prob

2001-09-07 Thread bpalmer
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: gcc -O2 -pipe -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../src/include -c -o hba.o hba.c hba.c: In function `ident_unix': hba.c:923: sizeof applied to an incomplete type hba.c:960: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type

Re: [HACKERS] developer's website

2001-07-30 Thread bpalmer
The developer's corner will soon be going away. I'm in the process of putting together a developer's site. Different URL, different look, beta announcements will be there, regression database will be there, developement docs, etc. If you want a sneak preview:

[HACKERS] Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..

2001-05-10 Thread bpalmer
My nightly regression tests for OBSD failed for i386 and sparc. Attached is the regression.diff, I don't know what to make of it.. Looks like problems w/ foreign keys. ... parallel group (5 tests): portals_p2 rules select_views alter_table foreign_key select_views ... ok

[HACKERS] Replication Docs..

2001-05-03 Thread bpalmer
I'm starting to throw together a web site relating to postgresql replication, trying to bring together the ideas we have thrown around so far. If anyone has any good docs (on replication not relating to postgresq too), please send me the links. Thanks. - Brandon b. palmer, [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

2001-05-03 Thread bpalmer
This behavior raises the question about file system usage in Postgres. Many databases, such as Oracle, create table space files and operate directly on the raw blocks, bypassing the file system altogether. OK, we have considered this, but frankly, the new, modern file systems like

Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...

2001-04-27 Thread bpalmer
Does anyone have any outstanding fixes for v7.1.x that they want to see in *before* we do this release? Any points unresolved that anyone knows about that we need to look at? Is there a list of what IS getting changed? Can this be posted somewhere or is the changelist enough? - Brandon

[HACKERS] broken web server?

2001-04-16 Thread bpalmer
I know this isn't really hackers traffic, but... one of the servers in www.postgresql.org is http://postgresql.bbksys.com/ which is giving me 404 errors.. I've mailed webmaster@, but thought this should be mailed on anyway.. - brandon b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp:

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread bpalmer
I just ran the "make check" (paralell regression tests) - instead of the "make installcheck" that I'd run previously... [nobody@web-cache regress]$ grep 'FAILED' regression.out test geometry ... FAILED test horology ... FAILED The relevant diff for horology seem

[HACKERS] OBSD resultmap changes needed.

2001-03-26 Thread bpalmer
I posted this to the list a few days ago, but it was not addressed. Can someone please make the changes to the src/test/regress/resultmap? Thanks. - brandon b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5 *** resultmap.orig Fri Mar 23 12:34:56 2001 ---

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms

2001-03-23 Thread bpalmer
OpenBSD 2.8 x867.1 2001-03-22, Brandon. Palmer OBSD checks out for sparc and i386. We did need to make a change to the resultmap file to make the regression tests clean for the sparc. I have attached the diff. Also, on the sparc that i'm using (sparc4/110), make check takes 1950

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms

2001-03-22 Thread bpalmer
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: OpenBSD 2.8 x867.1 2001-03-22, B. Palmer (first name?) Though it does work, like FBSD, there are some changes that need to be made to the system. Need max proc / files changes and a kernel recompile with SEMMNI and SEMMNS changes.

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms

2001-03-22 Thread bpalmer
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: OpenBSD 2.8 x867.1 2001-03-22, B. Palmer (first name?) Though it does work, like FBSD, there are some changes that need to be made to the system. Need max proc / files changes and a kernel recompile with SEMMNI and SEMMNS changes. Anywhere

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread bpalmer
$ uname -a OpenBSD mizer 2.8 a#0 i386 P3, default 2.8 install. Problems w/ TCL, but I think it's a local problem. System needs kernel changes as noted at www.crimelabs.net. (shared mem stuff). OBSD-sparc comming soon. - b b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp:

Re: [HACKERS] beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Lookingfor . . . ]

2001-01-25 Thread bpalmer
Worked fine for me... % uname -a SunOS lancelot 5.7 Generic_106541-14 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-4 % ls -l -rw-r--r-- 1 bpalmer staff32860160 Jan 23 16:45 postgresql-snapshot.tar ... ... ... transactions ... ok random ... failed (ignored

Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/???

2001-01-23 Thread bpalmer
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have added this to /contrib for 7.1. Not sure if you know this, but you checked in the code compiled and w/ the .o file... FYI. b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5

Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/???

2001-01-17 Thread bpalmer
I object. The code displays oids and tablenames or relnames. Oid is just the initial, default filename for tables, and may change to something other than the oid. Currently, the reindex code is the only place that could change the relfilenode without changing the oid, but I think there may be

[HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/???

2001-01-15 Thread bpalmer
On older versions of PG, 7.0 included, in the $PDGATA/base folder you could see the names of the databases for that $PGDATA. Now all I see is: $ ls -l total 16 drwx-- 2 postgres wheel 1536 Jan 12 15:42 1 drwx-- 2 postgres wheel 1536 Jan 12 15:41 18719 drwx-- 2 postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-12 Thread bpalmer
Speaking of which.. rpm -ivh ftp://ftp.postgresql/pub/whatever/postgresql-\*.rpm Is there a clearing house for packages? I have made some for OpenBSD (www.crimelabs.net/postgresql.shtml), but I wouldn't even know where to get the rpm or deb files. Should there be a folder on the ftp server

Re: [HACKERS] CVS regression test failure on OBSD

2001-01-07 Thread bpalmer
A few problems came up with 7.1CVS for i86 OpenBSD. Here is a writeup on what I learned and how I solved the problems. - Brandon b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5 Added gmake and gettext. (if you don't have it) Added bison and replaced /usr/bin/yacc with

Re: [HACKERS] CVS regression test failure on OBSD

2001-01-07 Thread bpalmer
Can you check http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/kernel-resources.htm#SYSVIPC to see if the description for FreeBSD is also applicable (at least in similar form) to OpenBSD? Close enough. I'm currently writing up a section about the process and file limit issue, which

[HACKERS] CVS regression test failure on OBSD

2001-01-06 Thread bpalmer
When I run 'make check' on the CVS version (today and for the last serveral days), I have been getting interesting failures. Some of the tests fail, but the interesting part is that not the same tests always fail. Example: bpalmer@mizer:~/APPS/pgsqldiff 1 2 1c1 boolean

Re: [HACKERS] CVS regression test failure on OBSD

2001-01-06 Thread bpalmer
In the postmaster: the fork() to launch a backend is failing. There should be a more detailed message in the postmaster's stderr log, but almost certainly it's a resource-exhaustion issue. Does your kernel enforce a per-userid limit on the number of processes, for example? Looks like that

Re: [HACKERS] CVS regression test failure on OBSD

2001-01-06 Thread bpalmer
the problem is solved. Should me make note of the changes what were needed for OBSD somewhere? b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5 bpalmer@mizer:~/APPS/pgsql/src/test/regressdiff -c resultmap resultmap.orig *** resultmap Sat Jan 6 19:35:02 2001

[HACKERS] 7.1 snapshot on i386 BSD MAJOR failure

2000-12-19 Thread bpalmer
Is this bad, or are there expected to be known problems like this for OBSD? 7.1beta1 had roughly the same errors.. - BEGIN --- bpalmer@mizer:~/PG7.1/postgresql-snapshotuname -a OpenBSD mizer 2.8 GENERIC#399 i386 bpalmer@mizer:~/PG7.1/postgresql

[HACKERS] Why vacuum?

2000-12-13 Thread bpalmer
I noticed the other day that one of my pg databases was slow, so I ran vacuum on it, which brought a question to mind: why the need? I looked at my oracle server and we aren't doing anything of the sort (that I can find), so why does pg need it? Any info? Thanks, - brandon b. palmer,