Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
limit it to \df+?
Huh? \df+ has displayed volatility for a long time, and I don't recall
any great demand to move it into \df.
Hmm, right. Maybe the problem I
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:05:10AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
limit it to \df+?
Huh? \df+ has displayed volatility for a long time, and I don't recall
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:05:10AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hmm, right. Maybe the problem I have is that we made \df+ so wide so as
to be almost useless by now ...
I think this is mostly caused by the args column getting too wide.
Can we remove
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:05:10AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hmm, right. Maybe the problem I have is that we made \df+ so
wide so as to be almost useless by now ...
I think this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
BTW what happened to the idea of displaying only user
functions by default?
It's waiting on me to submit an updated patch, per Heikki's
request. I'll try to get one out this week.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key:
On May 23, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
limit it to \df+?
Ideally we would have a short header for the column so that it
doesn't
take too much space, and specify the setting with a single
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
limit it to \df+?
Huh? \df+ has displayed volatility for a long time, and I don't recall
any great demand to move it into \df.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
limit it to \df+?
Ideally we would have a short header for the column so that it doesn't
take too much space, and specify the setting with a single letter. The
meaning of each letter we could display at the bottom of the table
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
limit it to \df+?
Ideally we would have a short header for the column so that it doesn't
take too much space, and specify the setting with a single letter. The
meaning of each letter we could display at
