Tatsuo,
I'm wondering if this was approved or not...
We haven't approved *anything* yet. The deadline was just Saturday, and I'm
still keying stuff into the conference management system.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of
-Original Message-
From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2006 23:08
To: Josh Berkus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page;
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL
Anniversary Proposals --Important Update
Hi
Well, aside from anything else, we seem likely to have
you, Devrim,
Magnus and maybe even Robert Treat there (Robert?). Which
would mean
a good time for a meeting of the Web Team, yes?
It seems that I'll be there, and yes, a PostgreSQL.org web
development
session will be
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 March 2006 08:31
To: Dave Page; Devrim GUNDUZ; Josh Berkus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL
Anniversary Proposals --Important Update
On Monday 20 March 2006 03:31, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Well, aside from anything else, we seem likely to have
you, Devrim,
Magnus and maybe even Robert Treat there (Robert?). Which
would mean
a good time for a meeting of the Web Team, yes?
It seems that I'll be
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote:
One example might be a 'self-aggregating' structure. Start with one
entry per minute in a table indexed by time. After 2 weeks passes, the
per-minute data is aggregated and the single entry at the start of the
day is updated with the
Dave,
I wouldn't mind talking (or hosting a discussion) but have been unable to
think of anything that other hackers might be interested in. I obviously
can't discuss the server internals in any great depth, but if anyone wants
to hear about pgadmin, pginstaller, the web infrastructure or
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hm, I already talked about that once:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/developer/transactions.pdf
but perhaps that's not the level of detail you are after?
Yeah, I've read the presentation -- and yes, that's not the level I am
after. Actually, I guess the
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkusjosh@agliodbs.com
Sent: 18/03/06 01:55:04
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orgpgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Heck, if you have
an idea
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 22:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
-- There are only 13 days left to submit a proposal. Please do so. We'd
rather not be forced into a last-minute rush to evaluate all of the stuff
in April. Remember this is a family event so you
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2006-03-18 kell 12:38, kirjutas Rod Taylor:
This will, presumably, be a very PostgreSQL friendly group so a sales
pitch isn't really required.
How about the opposite? Tom Lanes list of areas that PostgreSQL does a
poor job and a detailed explanation as to how that
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for me is: how
can we gaurantee that the rules are complete
Folks,
Wanted to update you on a few things regarding speaking at the upcoming
PostgreSQL Anniversary Summit:
-- There are only 13 days left to submit a proposal. Please do so. We'd
rather not be forced into a last-minute rush to evaluate all of the stuff
in April. Remember this is a
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
-- There are only 13 days left to submit a proposal. Please do so. We'd
rather not be forced into a last-minute rush to evaluate all of the stuff
in April. Remember this is a family event so you don't have to have all
of your materials together
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
What would people like to hear about?
I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for me is:
Qingqing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
What would people like to hear about?
I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL.
Hm, I already talked about that once:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/developer/transactions.pdf
but perhaps
16 matches
Mail list logo
