On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:34 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This release represents a major leap forward for PostgreSQL by adding
significant new functionality and performance enhancements. This was
made possible by a growing community that has
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
productnamePostgreSQL/. Many complex ideas that normally take years
to implement were added rapidly to this release by our development team.
You do
Kevin Grittner wrote:
How exactly do you expect the software to get from a .0 to a .1 release,
or to have addressed the bugs that might bite you when it does get to .1,
if you aren't helping to test it?
In most environments I've seen, developer and QA systems don't hesitate
to move to .0
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:37 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ron Mayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
install .0 releases of any software into production without months
of
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
If the goal is to provide fair warning of a high-than-usual-risk
release, you've got it covered.
No, that was not the intent. The indent was to say we got a lot done in
one
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:51:13AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
If the goal is to provide fair warning of a high-than-usual-risk
release, you've got it covered.
No, that
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
install .0 releases of any software into production without months
of testing. At which point, normally a .1 release has come out anyway.
How exactly do you expect the
[ BCC to docs and hackers. Sorry this seems like the only logical way
to do this.]
I have added the following introductory paragraph to the release notes:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
functionality and performance enhancements to
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
functionality and performance enhancements to
productnamePostgreSQL/. Many complex ideas that normally take years
to
Kevin Grittner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
functionality and performance enhancements to
productnamePostgreSQL/. Many complex ideas
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
productnamePostgreSQL/. Many complex ideas that normally take years
to implement were added rapidly to this release by our development team.
You do realize that this will make many
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 16:04 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have added the following introductory paragraph to the release notes:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
functionality and performance enhancements to
productnamePostgreSQL/. Many
On 10/11/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
functionality and performance
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
If the goal is to provide fair warning of a high-than-usual-risk
release, you've got it covered.
No, that was not the intent. The indent was to say we got a lot done in
one year. You have a suggestion?
Yeah: take the entire
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:34 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The indent was to say we got a lot done in
one year. You have a suggestion?
My suggestion would be to stay away from statements about the speed
of development and focus on the user
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:26:43 -0500
Kevin Grittner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant
new functionality and performance enhancements to
productnamePostgreSQL/. Many complex ideas that normally take
years to implement were added
On Oct 11, 2007, at 18:51 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
install .0 releases of any software into production without months
of testing. At which point, normally a .1 release has come out anyway.
At the same time, an open source
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
install .0 releases of any software into production without months
of testing. At which point, normally a .1 release has come out anyway.
How exactly do you expect the software to get from
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:20 -0400
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
Now I realize that you did say test above, but way too often I see
this sort of argument as a justification for
19 matches
Mail list logo
