On 11/01/2008, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 08:24 +, Richard Huxton wrote:
I've always considered TRUNCATE to be DDL rather than DML. I mentally
group it with DROP TABLE rather than DELETE
DDL/DML probably isn't the right split, since its then arguable as
= CURRENT_DATE
AND telecom_operator_id 0
AND telephone_number IN ( $numbers )
GROUP BY date_in
You may have to play to get exactly what you want but here worse case your
only doing one scan of the table not three... You may want to use views to
simplify things.
Peter Childs
On 03/08/07, Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 3, 2007, at 15:27 , Erik Jones wrote:
Is there actually a requirement that the block of 5000 values not
have gaps?
Good point.
If not, why not make the versioned table's id column default to
nextval from the same
On 24/07/07, Louis-David Mitterrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 03:10:44PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
Louis-David Mitterrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I use a another column to store the type of the id_subject (ie:
the
tabled it belongs to) ? Then I would be able
On 27/04/07, Aaron Bono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/26/07, Steve Midgley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So take
for example this foreign application variable:
ids = 3,2,5,1,4
The application then executes this sql:
select * from table where id in (3,2,5,1,4)
As-is, of course, the
On 14/12/06, ivan marchesini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Postgres Users,
I have 2 tables...
each one has a column called ID (primary keys of each table)
the values into each ID column are exactly the same.
each table has a lot of other columns (around 50 for each table)
I would like to
On 30/11/06, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to know if it is necessary to set my database to
autovaccum if the intent of my DB Manager is do not make any deletion
in any time.
If there is no deletions why autovaccum ok ?
it before it goes back to the
end user. I also don't think this has been made particularly
clear in changes.
Peter Childs
from main_table);
or
select f from (select A as t from main_table union select B as t from
main_table) group by t order by t;
hope that helps
Peter Childs
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
for 7.3.
2 Do you really need to know that column a in table 1 also appears in
table 1?
Peter Childs
Thanks
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
-Achilleus
---(end of broadcast
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Peter Childs wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Abdul Wahab Dahalan wrote:
Hi!
How do I list all the tables in the database which has a same column name?.
SELECT
got on
the todo list.
Peter Childs
The reason I think PG is doing sequential scans is because the execution
plan for the following query shows two sequential scans:
explain select *
from parent, child
where child.parentId = parent.id
With reference to the above, two (2) questions:
1
. Full problem with it can be seen of Bugs
Peter Childs
-- CREATE TABLE history ( tab textfieldtext
action textbefore text
aftertextoccured timestamp without
gui try pgaccess and the like. If you want to
writea full gui pick you favoute language and there should be some
postgres drivers (if all else fails there is always ODBC)
somthing like perl or python may be nice and platform
independant
Peter Childs
best regards,
Ries
,
C.ID as KRITERIENFELDID, C.SELFLD
from table as G, table as L, table as C
where
and G.SELID = L.SELID
and L.SELID = C.SELID
and L.SELLEVEL = C.SELLEVEL;
Where table is the name of the table
I hope that helps
Peter Childs
15 matches
Mail list logo
