2008/5/21 Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was going to ignore this, but I'm in a confrontational mood today, so
please accept my apologies for the noise.
On 21 May 2008, at 14:08, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
Note: I am working for the french Ministry of Defense.
On 22 May 2008, at 09:56, Robin Vickery wrote:
2008/5/21 Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was going to ignore this, but I'm in a confrontational mood
today, so
please accept my apologies for the noise.
On 21 May 2008, at 14:08, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
Note:
I'm sure Stut (and others) have said enough, but I can no longer
resist...
On May 21, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
CSS, but I may not be understanding what you mean by blunt.
Javascript
can be written such that it eats CPU and/or memory
2008/5/22 Philip Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm sure Stut (and others) have said enough, but I can no longer resist...
On May 21, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
I do not know, what this urchinTacker() does, but since it is named
Am 2008-05-21 13:28:08, schrieb tedd:
Well then, all web sites are a privacy violation by your definition.
Not realy, since IF YOU are collecting data of customers/visiort you are
responsable for this stuff and for ANY misuse you can be sued.
Web sites come standard with server logs and other
Am 2008-05-12 15:36:30, schrieb tedd:
Now, how is that a security threat? Or is the claim that any site
that uses js is a security threat?
END OF REPLIED MESSAGE
One of my customers is the french Ministry of Defense and IF ENOUGH
websites
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
CSS, but I may not be understanding what you mean by blunt. Javascript
can be written such that it eats CPU and/or memory but this is of no
benefit to anyone so unless you're running on a prehistoric machine I
can't see that being an issue. And it's
At 3:08 PM +0200 5/21/08, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
Well, some of his pages do but that's complicating the issue. As far
as I can tell the only bit of Javascript common to all Tedd's pages is
the Google Analytics code which is not required for you to use
I was going to ignore this, but I'm in a confrontational mood today,
so please accept my apologies for the noise.
On 21 May 2008, at 14:08, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
CSS, but I may not be understanding what you mean by blunt.
Javascript
can be written
9 matches
Mail list logo
