Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
Mark Charette wrote:
Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
I heard that shared memory is actually slower than writing and
reading a file and it is not available on windows systems.
Hmmm ... that's an interesting thing you heard concerning shared
memory. Care to share
Hi people,
I have written an extensive web application frameworks, and I keep
seeing my execution time and memory-usage growing. Right now it is not a
problem, but before it get's out of hands I will need to create a good
cache engine.
My cache engine requires that I can cache method results,
Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
I have written an extensive web application frameworks, and I keep
seeing my execution time and memory-usage growing. Right now it is not a
problem, but before it get's out of hands I will need to create a good
cache engine.
My cache engine requires that I can
Chris Smith wrote:
I have seen some people using stornig cached items in shared memory.
This is explained in some detail here:
http://www.danga.com/memcached/
I heard that shared memory is actually slower than writing and reading a
file and it is not available on windows systems.
There are PHP
Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
I heard that shared memory is actually slower than writing and reading a
file and it is not available on windows systems.
Hmmm ... that's an interesting thing you heard concerning shared memory.
Care to share _who_ told you that?
I'd like to make sure I don't
Mark Charette wrote:
Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
I heard that shared memory is actually slower than writing and reading
a file and it is not available on windows systems.
Hmmm ... that's an interesting thing you heard concerning shared memory.
Care to share _who_ told you that?
I'd like
Mark Charette wrote:
Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
I heard that shared memory is actually slower than writing and
reading a file and it is not available on windows systems.
Hmmm ... that's an interesting thing you heard concerning shared
memory. Care to share _who_ told you that?
I'd like
Evert - Rooftop Solutions wrote:
Check it out, is in old article, but it says |shm| -- The |shm|
container stores the cached data in the shared memory. Benchmarks
indicate that the current implementation of this container is much
slower than the |file| container.
Which, of course, is miles away
8 matches
Mail list logo
