On Thursday 16 January 2003 09:07, Dhaval Desai wrote:
Hello ppl,
I was just wondering what is php's future with something like Asp .Net
coming up...I have read many articles by Php guys who think Asp.Net is the
future. If that's the true case...is it really worth sticking to Php at
all?
On Thursday 16 January 2003 09:07, Dhaval Desai wrote:
Hello ppl,
I was just wondering what is php's future with something like Asp .Net
coming up...I have read many articles by Php guys who think Asp.Net is
the
future. If that's the true case...is it really worth sticking to Php at
Dhaval Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
Hello ppl,
I have read many articles by Php guys who think Asp.Net is the
future.
What PHP guys?
If that's the true case...is it really worth sticking to Php at all?
Definitely yes, unless you love paying the licenses for every single
form you
leave PHP, work with ASP .NET and let Microsoft gain more domination and say
bye bye for your freedom, then let develpment go and work as a machine that
does like Microsoft wants
oh, i forgot, remember to submit ASP .NET bug reports to their site, to get
a reply after 5 months :)
Open-Source
Sancar Saran wrote:
On Thursday 16 January 2003 09:07, Dhaval Desai wrote:
Hello ppl,
I was just wondering what is php's future with something like Asp .Net
coming up...I have read many articles by Php guys who think Asp.Net is the
future. If that's the true case...is it really worth sticking
Hello ppl,
I was just wondering what is php's future with something like Asp .Net
coming up...I have read many articles by Php guys who think Asp.Net is the
future. If that's the true case...is it really worth sticking to Php at all?
Thanx!
-Dhaval
IMHO, and without even comparing the feature sets, php has one distinct
advantage for me: It's free.
I'm pretty sure a lot of hosting companies feel the same way.
Keith
At 11:07 PM 1/15/2003, Dhaval Desai wrote:
Hello ppl,
I was just wondering what is php's future with something like Asp .Net
What is asp.net?
It's something to catch a snake with!
Quoting Dhaval Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
### Hello ppl,
###
### I was just wondering what is php's future with something like Asp .Net
### coming up...I have read many articles by Php guys who think Asp.Net is the
###
### future. If
Hi all in the list :
I read an news that said jsp/asp.net is better than php..
They made a test that asp/php/jsp/asp.net using for loops,
Jsp from 1 to 2 takes only 4 secs
Asp from 1 to 2000 (not 2) takes 72 secs
Php from 1 to 2000 (not 2) takes 68 secs
Asp.Net from 1 to 2
, September 02, 2001 7:54 PM
To: nick
Subject: Re: [PHP] php's future
Where did you see that?
Faisal
At 04:28 PM 9/2/2001, you wrote:
Hi all in the list :
I read an news that said jsp/asp.net is better than php..
They made a test that asp/php/jsp/asp.net using for loops,
Jsp from 1 to 2 takes
Haha I tried its code and it only takes 1~2 secs to run it .
Wellgod damn lies
-Original Message-
From: nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:38 PM
To: 'Faisal Nasim'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] php's future
It's Chinese .
I
-Original Message-
From: nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:38 PM
To: 'Faisal Nasim'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] php's future
It's Chinese .
I translated it maybe u cannot understand bcoz my English is not
good
First: jsp test
I can say.. It is really depends on your system specification and the users of
it
If the benchmark result is correct.. I think everybody will learn JSP rather
than doing Php...
Check your sources.. I guess they are not professional enough..
Have a nice day.
Regards
Ming
Jack Sasportas
nick wrote:
Haha I tried its code and it only takes 1~2 secs to run it .
Wellgod damn lies
Intersting. I tried the following code (which gives much more detailed
time info, check it out - stolen from Andrey Hristov on php-db), and my
times, on our P2-266 webserver, are just above
And, of course, the JSP was running 2 x 2 iterations, or 400,000,000
iterations, in a few seconds.
Yeah, right.
Intersting. I tried the following code (which gives much more detailed
time info, check it out - stolen from Andrey Hristov on php-db), and my
times, on our P2-266
Actually, an optimizing Java compiler would have detected it was a dead
loop (i.e. didn't actually do anything) and just skipped it, meaning it
took four seconds just to load the JSP page and invoke the bean. :) :)
The only benchmarks that mean anything are your actual web applications
running
So, we can say that on scripts that accomplish absolutely nothing, jsp
is faster than php - I can live with that :) Most of my scripts do
accomplish something (intended or not!) ;)
Tim wrote:
Actually, an optimizing Java compiler would have detected it was a dead
loop (i.e. didn't actually
So sprach »Chris Hobbs« am 2001-09-02 um 12:00:26 -0700 :
Of course, I'm trying to figure out when I would have a script that
really needed to go through 4M iterations, and thus (like most
Well, this is of course true, but I can easily imagine a script which is
run 200,000 times per second
me too and as the max execution time is 30 secs and there's no code to
override it.
- Original Message -
From: nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'nick' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] php's future
| Haha I tried its code
So sprach »Paul Roberts« am 2001-09-02 um 17:06:08 +0100 :
me too and as the max execution time is 30 secs and there's no code to
override it.
Not so.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.set-time-limit.php
http://www.php.net/manual/en/configuration.php#ini.max-execution-time
PS: Quote
i think he meant in that specific code, they don't change the default time,
therefore, it'd be impossible
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Paul Roberts« am 2001-09-02 um 17:06:08 +0100 :
me too and as the max execution time is 30 secs and there's no code to
override it.
Not so.
So sprach »Jack Dempsey« am 2001-09-02 um 16:29:52 -0400 :
i think he meant in that specific code, they don't change the default time,
therefore, it'd be impossible
Ah, I see. Well, yes, that's right.
Uhm - maybe not. Although very unlikely, it's possible that they've
changed it in the
Pardon my English - I don't know Chinese. :(
That's the worst comparison benchmarks I've ever seen.
http://www.zdnet.com/enterprise/stories/linux/0,12249,2646052,00.html
DAMN - they've moved it. Anyone got a better link? The only
one I could find was
I also can hardly believe the 84+ sec. In such case all PHP template
engines may run for a thousand years.
- Original Message -
From: nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'nick' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 2:56 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] php's future
Haha
24 matches
Mail list logo
