php-general Digest 6 Jul 2011 13:31:50 - Issue 7392
Topics (messages 313932 through 313947):
Re: vend-bot?
313932 by: Kirk Bailey
313947 by: Stuart Dallas
Re: Top Posting
313933 by: Jim Giner
313934 by: Daniel Brown
313936 by: Lester Caine
On 2011-07-05, at 8:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from a real
person ONE TIME ONLY?
--
I know that I do. I monitor our web site's registration
Tamara Temple wrote:
And then, we have the case of a signature being 3 times as long as the
reply
Which is less of a problem if the email client correctly trims it! I can
probably come up with a list of posts just to this list where a top poster has
included several signatures several
Hello, everybody.
While working with static variables inside static class' methods, I have
found this very interesting (at least for me) behavior of PHP.
Consider the following class definitions (example #1):
class X {
public final static function test() {
static $i;
return ++$i;
}
}
class Y
I think you are confusing scope visibility level of the variable within
method and the class.
Variable within the method is going to 1 because it was declare within the
test method and there no link to the one declared outside the test method.
The second case is referencing the varible of the
Jim Giner wrote:
Eureka!
The whole problem was my unfamiliarity with the php download page. To
others - read the choices there very carefully (which I thought I did!) to
be sure you get the thread-safe version.
Thanks to all who contributed, but David gets the kudos for telling me to
On 2011-07-05, Stuart Dallas penned the words:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:29 PM, ad...@buskirkgraphics.com wrote:
Anyone know how to make Outlook changes its reply position.
Google delivers...
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/macros4outlook/index.php?title
=QuoteFix_Macro
Many thanks
Hi all,
OK. We all know that constants cannot be accessed directly via their name
in double-quoted or heredoc strings. I knew this already but a read of
the PHP manual got me thinking.
The manual states that to get the $$ value of a variable, the form
{${var}} should be used. Therefore, I
And that's exactly how I did it :)
Since 'for' is traditionally pre-testing with excetuting the condition prior
looping it's working well :)
Thanks for all the help!
Cheers,
Tamas
-Original Message-
From: Louis Huppenbauer [mailto:louis.huppenba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
On 7/6/2011 7:07 AM, Dave Wilson wrote:
Output - {XYZ}
Attempt 2:
?php
define ('XYZ','ABC');
echo {{XYZ}}\n;
?
Output - {{XYZ}}
No luck there. I did encounter one oddity though:
?php
define ('XYZ','ABC');
echo {${XYZ}}\n;
?
Output:
PHP Notice: Undefined variable: ABC in
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Dave Wilson dai_bac...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
OK. We all know that constants cannot be accessed directly via their name
in double-quoted or heredoc strings. I knew this already but a read of
the PHP manual got me thinking.
The manual states that to get
Any ideas?
echo XYZ . \n;
--Curtis
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Which doesn't answer the original question Dave asked...
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.
On Wednesday, July 6, 2011, Dave Wilson wrote:
OK. We all know that constants cannot be accessed directly via their
name in double-quoted or heredoc strings.
FWIW, this looked like it might be a right royal PITA for me ATM.
However, I've got a work-around.
With about a dozen scripts written
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Kirk Bailey kbai...@howlermonkey.netwrote:
On 7/3/2011 4:53 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
Only allowing them to access the URL once is a bad idea. If their download
fails, is corrupt, or any number of other things go wrong (think
accelerators, browser
What do you think you gain by limiting the link to a single use? If you
think you're preventing them from passing it on to other people, then yes
you are, but if you do that then they'll simply send the digital file
instead so you're actually trading a poor user experience and increased
George Langley george.lang...@shaw.ca wrote in message
news:841bbd90-9cd4-4df5-9a38-ff61638f7...@shaw.ca...
On 2011-07-05, at 8:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:56:21 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
My guess is that the preceding $ causes PHP to interpret the next token
{XYZ} as a variable or a constant, but without that preceding $ it has
no way to know you're trying to use a constant. As Curtis points out,
the only way to insert a
On 2011-07-06, at 8:02 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
George Langley george.lang...@shaw.ca wrote :
On 2011-07-05, at 8:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from a real
person
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wilson [mailto:dai_bac...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 10:11 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Constants in strings
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:56:21 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
My guess is that the preceding $ causes PHP
define('DIR_JAVA', '/js/');
When you need to use the JavaScript directory you can do this.
script src=?php echo DIR_JAVA . 'jquery-1.5.1.js';?/script
There is no true need for the curly brackets to echo out the value of
the constant.
Except for when you're using heredoc, much like in the
Yeah, that was my answer and I was rebuked for that.
ad...@buskirkgraphics.com wrote:
-Original
Message-
From: Dave Wilson
[mailto:dai_bac...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06,
2011 10:11 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Constants in strings
On
Wed, 06 Jul
-Original Message-
From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 10:49 AM
To: ad...@buskirkgraphics.com; 'Dave Wilson'; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Constants in strings
define('DIR_JAVA', '/js/');
When you need to
On 2011-07-6 08:09, ad...@buskirkgraphics.com
ad...@buskirkgraphics.com wrote:
I use constants in my OOP and I never use the heredoc syntax. Now I am
fearing that I have not taken advantage of something.
My understanding of heredoc syntax as of 5.3 is just a string quoting
right?
Is there an
On 7/6/2011 9:31 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Kirk Bailey
kbai...@howlermonkey.net mailto:kbai...@howlermonkey.net wrote:
On 7/3/2011 4:53 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
Only allowing them to access the URL once is a bad idea.
If their download
because some emails do not permit large attachments.
On 7/6/2011 9:47 AM, Steve Staples wrote:
What do you think you gain by limiting the link to a single use? If you
think you're preventing them from passing it on to other people, then yes
you are, but if you do that then they'll simply send
On 7/5/2011 7:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
And what do you use to cut down on spam in your in-box?
This is completely off topic, but here it goes...
When I received an email the other day from your mail server, I had created this
crazy ass reply to your automatic request for a reply. But in turn,
I LOVE the heredocs tool. I only learned about it a couple of months ago -
what a find! It makes generating my html for my web pages so much
easier and allows me to include my php vars within the html with much less
confusion and simplifies the intermixing of html and php vars - no more
You are currently listed in my /etc/postfix/helo_checks file as
64.118.87.45 REJECT Your mail server is a source of SPAM. Fix it!
My mail server is my isp's. It is a shared server and not under my control.
They are aware that is listed but cannot get to the bottom of why it is
flagged.
On 11-07-06 02:59 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
I LOVE the heredocs tool. I only learned about it a couple of months ago -
what a find! It makes generating my html for my web pages so much
easier and allows me to include my php vars within the html with much less
confusion and simplifies the
On 6 Jul 2011, at 20:03, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't know why you are getting mail from me - I'm not sending you
any.
FFS and for the last time... THIS IS A MAILING LIST which you access through a
newsgroup gateway. It is NOT a newsgroup!
-Stuart
--
Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote in message
news:e73bd95e-0524-4743-92be-ae211b57e...@3ft9.com...
On 6 Jul 2011, at 20:03, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't know why you are getting mail from me - I'm not sending
you
any.
FFS and for the last time... THIS IS
On 06 Jul 2011 at 20:03, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
You are currently listed in my /etc/postfix/helo_checks file as
64.118.87.45 REJECT Your mail server is a source of SPAM. Fix it!
My mail server is my isp's. It is a shared server and not under my control.
They are
On 06 Jul 2011 at 20:03, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't know why you are getting mail from me - I'm not sending you
any.
You're sending mail to all of us. Here's what I got from you:
To: php-general@lists.php.net
From:Jim Giner
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 15:25, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
Forgive me for not being a know-it-all. I don't even know what FFS means.
Took me a minute to figure it out as well, and I was just getting
ready to Google it when I thought to myself, what is it that Stut
would
Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote in message
news:e5.d2.37602.f96b4...@pb1.pair.com...
On 06 Jul 2011 at 20:03, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
As for your solution to spam. What is Postfix?
Rather than rely on heuristics, I wrote a Bayesian filter for my e-mail app.
Let
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.comwrote:
Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote in message
news:e73bd95e-0524-4743-92be-ae211b57e...@3ft9.com...
On 6 Jul 2011, at 20:03, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't know why you are getting
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:03:44PM -0400, Jim Giner wrote:
[snip]
As for your solution to spam. What is Postfix?
Postfix is a *nix program which can be connected to whatever program you
use to grab mail with. With postfix, you write recipes which dictate
what will be done with a piece of
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Kirk Bailey kbai...@howlermonkey.netwrote:
**
On 7/6/2011 9:31 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Kirk Bailey kbai...@howlermonkey.netwrote:
On 7/3/2011 4:53 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
Only allowing them to access the URL once is a bad
On Jul 6, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
Postfix is a *nix program which can be connected to whatever program
you
use to grab mail with. With postfix, you write recipes which dictate
what will be done with a piece of incoming mail, based on whatever
characteristics you choose. Think
On 7/07/2011, at 5:50 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
On 7/5/2011 7:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
And what do you use to cut down on spam in your in-box?
This is completely off topic, but here it goes...
When I received an email the other day from your mail server, I had created
this
crazy ass reply
The second case is referencing the varible of the class.
Maybe you are right. However, I don't really think that there is a true
reference to the class var in example #2.
PHP documentation of static keywords does not unambiguously explain behavior
of static variables inside methods in example
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:24:29PM -0500, Tamara Temple wrote:
On Jul 6, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
Postfix is a *nix program which can be connected to whatever
program you
use to grab mail with. With postfix, you write recipes which dictate
what will be done with a piece of
2011/7/6 Дмитрий Степанов dmit...@stepanov.lv
PHP documentation of static keywords does not unambiguously explain
behavior
of static variables inside methods in example #1. I believe that in
example #1 the exactly same instance of function (method) is used
irregarding of how you call it
Please include the list when replying.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Kirk Bailey kbai...@howlermonkey.netwrote:
Um, assuming dishonest intent on the customers part, why would the token
NOT be shared?
I meant shared within your system between customers. Whether you lock the
URL or not, if
Again, please include the list when replying.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Kirk Bailey kbai...@howlermonkey.netwrote:
**
On 7/6/2011 6:08 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
Please include the list when replying.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Kirk Bailey kbai...@howlermonkey.netwrote:
Um,
Hello Jim Giner,
Am 2011-07-05 22:52:39, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Huh? You have a problem with a person having a spam filter that requires
one valid response to ensure that the mail from an address is from a real
person ONE TIME ONLY?
The problem is, that
1) I read the messages on
46 matches
Mail list logo
