[PHP] Re: Does PHP need another mailing list???

2004-09-22 Thread Niklas Lampén
It's wrong to think people here don't know how to code object oriented. You can do that with PHP4 too - and you should in many cases. In some time PHP4 will be old school and PHP5 will be the general one. In my oppinion, it's good for not-OO ppl to see how to do things in OO way. If you have

Re: [PHP] Re: Does PHP need another mailing list???

2004-09-22 Thread Gerard Samuel
Niklas Lampén wrote: It's wrong to think people here don't know how to code object oriented. You can do that with PHP4 too - and you should in many cases. In some time PHP4 will be old school and PHP5 will be the general one. In my oppinion, it's good for not-OO ppl to see how to do things in

Re: [PHP] Re: Does PHP need another mailing list???

2004-09-22 Thread Marek Kilimajer
Gerard Samuel wrote: Niklas Lampén wrote: It's wrong to think people here don't know how to code object oriented. You can do that with PHP4 too - and you should in many cases. In some time PHP4 will be old school and PHP5 will be the general one. In my oppinion, it's good for not-OO ppl to see

RE: [PHP] Re: Does PHP need another mailing list???

2004-09-22 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip] Reason why I say that, is because in my mind, OO (especially when combined with design patterns) is a higher language than plain vanilla php. [/snip] Replace PHP with C++ and you'll see how ridiculous this statement looks. It is as if you were pitting PROCEDURAL against OOP, which we

Re: [PHP] Re: Does PHP need another mailing list???

2004-09-22 Thread Gerard Samuel
Marek Kilimajer wrote: Gerard Samuel wrote: Niklas Lampén wrote: It's wrong to think people here don't know how to code object oriented. You can do that with PHP4 too - and you should in many cases. In some time PHP4 will be old school and PHP5 will be the general one. In my oppinion, it's good