Bug#662773: debi: Please (re-)introduce -u short form for --upgrade

2012-03-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 06.03.2012 10:11, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Previous versions of debi supported the use of -u instead of --upgrade if I am not mistaken. This was not documented in the manpage, but it was definitely useful. So, could you please re-introduce that? For the record, you /are/ mistaken, which

Bug#662773: debi: Please (re-)introduce -u short form for --upgrade

2012-03-06 Thread James McCoy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:50:22AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 06.03.2012 10:11, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Previous versions of debi supported the use of -u instead of --upgrade if I am not mistaken. This was not documented in the manpage, but it was definitely useful. So, could you

Bug#662794: [devscripts] [nmudiff] Please, add a non-dd template for those who can not upload NMUs

2012-03-06 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Package: devscripts Version: 2.11.4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Non-DDs can't upload NMUs but can write patches and use nmudiff. Default behaviour of nmudiff is not adapted to non-DDs because: 1.- Pending tag is applied. 2.- Default message says the package will be uploaded. I know you can

Processed: [devscripts] Patch fixing message template attached in #662794

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 555863 patch Bug #555863 [devscripts] [nmudiff] Use a message template Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 555863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555863 Debian

Bug#555863: [devscripts] Patch fixing message template attached in #662794

2012-03-06 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
tags 555863 patch thanks #662794 provides a patch that fixes this bug. I hope it's useful for you. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part