Yay for missing this email.
On Friday 24 September 2010 22:19:21 James Vega wrote:
Specifically for non-HTML responses from FTP sites, we could split the
response on newlines and examine each line on its own (like the attached
patch). This would prevent sloppy regexes from slurping up
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.68
Severity: important
User: devscri...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: uscan
Hi,
Current hylafax's watch file triggers a bug in uscan's ftp listing parsing.
The watch file can be found at:
$ uscan ... --report --verbose ...
...
On 24 September 2010 13:20, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Current hylafax's watch file triggers a bug in uscan's ftp listing parsing.
The watch file can be found at:
I think there's some missing text there ;-)
Er,
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 14:27 -0400, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Current hylafax's watch file triggers a bug in uscan's ftp listing parsing.
The watch file can be
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:30:26PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 24 September 2010 13:20, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
fwiw, this is trivially fixable in the watch file by stopping it being
overly greedy; this watchfile works correctly:
