Mario Limonciello ha scritto:
Attaching so exchange doesn't mangle.
From 4c476152d9ed97e5aae2e20c6ab050b220c2ec42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mario Limonciello mario_limoncie...@dell.com
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:34:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] update debian/copyright to add mario
Ben Hutchings ha scritto:
While this isn't an essential part of dkms, so it's kind of a false
positive, I think you do need to add a dependency on make because
linux-kbuild-* doesn't appear to depend on it.
I agree, added.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Ben Hutchings ha scritto:
architecture). I think the best thing to do may be to remove all the
architecture qualifications:
Committed
One last thing: the postinst does:
update-rc.d -f dkms_autoinstaller remove /dev/null 21
If this command fails then installation will fail. In
Ben Hutchings ha scritto:
I don't know. Anyway, I'll upload 2.0.21.1-1 based on git commit
e15d5dd.
Thanks.
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-dkms-maint mailing list
Pkg-dkms-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org
Patrick Matthäi ha scritto:
Very cute.
This autobuilder, which starts on booting the machine, built the module
correctly, which would mean, that it was built there as user root, but
calling it from the maintainer scripts = nobody..
Where we can find the fglrx-modules-dkms package? dkms
Version: 2.1.1.0-1
Artur Rona ha scritto:
Please update dkms to 2.1.1.0 version. It would be nice to merge with
Ubuntu's package.
Already updated, thanks.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-dkms-maint
block 560822 by 569724
thanks
Il 27/02/2010 07:31, Michael Gilbert ha scritto:
dkms_autoinstaller script was indeed run in the kernel's postinst, but
it failed because i had forgotten the headers (note this wouldn't
have been obvious to the average user). so thinking that all i need
now are
Il 27/02/2010 08:04, Michael Gilbert ha scritto:
this is because dkms doesn't have any cleanup code to remove the
modules and files it creates. would it be make sense to add some
dkms cleanup code to the kernel's postrm? if i find the time, i
will look into this (if it sounds reasonable).
tags 586356 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:32:33 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Added
tags 588585 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:06:18 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload
tags 589308 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:15:39 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Promote lsb
On 07/17/2010 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
This looks to me like a missing dependency on lsb-release in
nvidia-kernel-dkms, not in dkms. And I don't understand why a
Pre-Depends would be necessary anywhere. Care to explain?
nvidia-kernel-dkms postint runs /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst
tags 547353 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:47:29 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Do not use
tags 761728 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:11:13 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Depends
tags 659672 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:38:21 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
fixes
15 matches
Mail list logo
