On 22/06/15 23:50, Arthur de Jong wrote:
Control: reassign -1 evolution-data-server 3.16.3-1
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 21:31 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
which means the first line ends up as 1003 characters. While this
technically may be a bug in that software it is
On 15/06/15 12:28, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push
this to jessie.
So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently
missing from the jessie
On 15/06/15 10:46, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to
get
3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for
upstream
point updates
On 15/06/15 07:53, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hi Emilio,
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data
-server/. Use
that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug
against
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:01:03 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer
cales...@scientia.net wrote:
Package: evolution
Version: 3.12.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hey.
evolution segfaults at start since some of todays upgrades.
Is this still an issue? If so, please
Hi Fabian,
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:18:59 +0200 Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org wrote:
Dear pkg-evolution,
this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in
unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails
from being sent without evolution (and thus
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 787378 787379 787390
Hi,
I have uploaded evolution-data-server 3.16 to experimental, which
bumps the SONAMEs of its libraries.
Of the rdeps, these can be binNMUed:
severity 746436 important
tags 746436 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On 02/05/14 17:07, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Jordi,
thank you for your reply!
Am Donnerstag, den 01.05.2014, 15:32 +0200 schrieb Jordi Mallach:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:16:44AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Another transition. The plan is:
1/ upload from experimental to unstable:
evolution-data-server
evolution
evolution-mapi
evolution-ews
2/ binnmu as needed
I have rebuilt the rdeps
On 28/03/14 13:58, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
you might want to tell upstream not to mix GPL and LGPL in the file headers.
Hah! Nice catch. I have reported it upstream at:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727237
Emilio
Thorsten
/*
* camel-subscribable.h
On 12/05/13 23:53, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi,
The ftbfs bugs caused by vala and a new gobject-introspection can easily be
fixed (at least in most cases) by switching to valac-0.20 which just got its way
into unstable. I just fixed bug #707378 this way by switching the build
dependency
Hi,
The ftbfs bugs caused by vala and a new gobject-introspection can easily be
fixed (at least in most cases) by switching to valac-0.20 which just got its way
into unstable. I just fixed bug #707378 this way by switching the build
dependency accordingly.
Regards,
Emilio
On 15/02/11 17:00, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
tag 613546 pending
thanks
On mar., 2011-02-15 at 15:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus
it
should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. This is likely to cause other
packages
On 19/02/11 10:43, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2011-02-19 at 10:35 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On mar., 2011-02-15 at 15:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus
it
should depend on libcamel1.2-dev
Package: libebook1.2-dev
Version: 2.32.2-1
Severity: important
Since 2.32, libebook1.2-dev requires camel-1.2 on the .pc file. Thus it
should depend on libcamel1.2-dev. This is likely to cause other packages
to FTBFS, though I don't have an example right now.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: evolution-data-server-dbg
Version: 2.30.2.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
evolution-data-server-dbg provides debugging symbols for all the packages
built by evolution-data-server, not just for the evolution-data-server
binary package. This it useful with other packages than e-d-s. Hence it
16 matches
Mail list logo
