Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# There's no such version in debian.
# Caused by the submitter's local package when following up.
notfound 442029 0.0.4stable-2.1
Bug#442029: Violates policy 9.1 10.7 MUSTs
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.0.4stable-2.1.
thanks
Stopping
# There's no such version in debian.
# Caused by the submitter's local package when following up.
notfound 442029 0.0.4stable-2.1
thanks
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14/09/2007):
My patch _does_ ship them, and I was explaining why it ships them
where it does and not under
severity 442029 normal
thanks
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/09/2007):
| AUTHORS -- doesn't ship, must be in $(DOCDIR)
Must? What about the copyright file?
(1) sorry, that wasn't as clear as it should have been. It doesn't
ship, and it's not clear why -- that's a minor bug, yes --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 442029 normal
Bug#442029: Violates policy 9.1 10.7 MUSTs
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
scripsit Cyril Brulebois:
severity 442029 normal
thanks
I'm not going to get into a reversion war over this; that's just a bit
too Wikipedia-esque. So the bug's Normal. Let's move on.
It is not shipped, stop arguing about non-existing problem.
[...]
Also, stop arguing about should be
scripsit Cyril Brulebois:
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12/09/2007):
My questions about the exact content of the bug remains, because “FHS
violations” isn't self-explanatory.
For the sake of completeness, posting the following here, so as to
demonstrate how many points of the
6 matches
Mail list logo
