Processing of conquest_8.3-2_i386.changes

2008-03-26 Thread Archive Administrator
conquest_8.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: conquest_8.3-2.dsc conquest_8.3-2.diff.gz conquest-data_8.3-2_all.deb conquest_8.3-2_i386.deb conquest-gl_8.3-2_i386.deb conquest-libs_8.3-2_i386.deb conquest-server_8.3-2_i386.deb Greetings,

conquest_8.3-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2008-03-26 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: conquest-data_8.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest-data_8.3-2_all.deb conquest-gl_8.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest-gl_8.3-2_i386.deb conquest-libs_8.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest-libs_8.3-2_i386.deb conquest-server_8.3-2_i386.deb to

Bug#454998: marked as done (conquest: Please add real person(s) to Maintainer or Uploaders)

2008-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#454998: fixed in conquest 8.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #454998, regarding conquest: Please add real person(s) to Maintainer or Uploaders to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#472445: marked as done (conquest: No real maintainer)

2008-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#472445: fixed in conquest 8.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #472445, regarding conquest: No real maintainer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processing of snowballz_0.9.5.1-1_i386.changes

2008-03-26 Thread Archive Administrator
snowballz_0.9.5.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: snowballz_0.9.5.1-1.dsc snowballz_0.9.5.1.orig.tar.gz snowballz_0.9.5.1-1.diff.gz snowballz_0.9.5.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Processing of adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_i386.changes

2008-03-26 Thread Archive Administrator
adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1.dsc adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz adanaxisgpl-data_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_all.deb adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb Greetings,

adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2008-03-26 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: adanaxisgpl-data_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/adanaxisgpl/adanaxisgpl-data_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1_all.deb adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adanaxisgpl/adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz adanaxisgpl_1.2.5.dfsg.1-1.dsc to

Bug#463741: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

2008-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:02:30 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463741: fixed in adanaxisgpl 1.2.5.dfsg.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #463741, regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#472866: gnome-chess: default configuration is completely unusable

2008-03-26 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Package: gnome-chess Version: 0.4.0-2 Severity: important Hi, the default configuration of gnome-chess first doesn't find its own piece set, and then draws all squares with the same colour. There also is no hint or error message. Of course there should be a sane default setup. Nikolaus --

Bug#472868: gnome-chess: cannot connect to internet chess server; segfaults

2008-03-26 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Package: gnome-chess Version: 0.4.0-2 Severity: normal Hi, gnome-chess doesn't connect to an internet chess server. I'm attaching the output from running gnome-chess from the command line with this command: $ gnome-chess --ics --icshost=freechess.org --icsuser=XX \ --icspass=X

Bug#472675: supertuxkart: 472675: extra information needed

2008-03-26 Thread Paul Wise
According to the plib site, ssgInit should be called after an OpenGL context is available (or glutInit has been called and a window created). Looking at the code suggests that this is fine. http://plib.sourceforge.net/ssg/ I can't reproduce the bug in i386 with an Intel graphics card. I'd say it