On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 09:28:30AM +0000, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> Author: goneri-guest
> Log:
> Add patch by Brian m. Carlson to fix the build wiith gcc 4.2
>
> +Index: starfighter-1.1/code/game.cpp
> +===================================================================
> +--- starfighter-1.1.orig/code/game.cpp 2007-09-22 09:51:54.000000000
> +0000
> ++++ starfighter-1.1/code/game.cpp 2007-09-22 09:53:16.000000000 +0000
> @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@
> then = SDL_GetTicks();
> frames = 0;
> @@ -28,23 +32,27 @@
> - // Do nothing. If we were to insert an SDL_Delay(1) in
> here
> - // then we would actually lose around 10 frames per
> second!!
> - }
> -+ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - SDL_GetTicks() >? 0 <? 16);
> ++ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - std::max(std::min(SDL_GetTicks(),
> 0), 16));
> frameLimit = SDL_GetTicks();
> // Limit us to 60 frame a second
> - while (SDL_GetTicks() < (frameLimit + 16)){}
> -+ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - SDL_GetTicks() >? 0 <? 16);
> ++ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - std::max(std::min(SDL_GetTicks(),
> 0), 16));
> frameLimit = SDL_GetTicks();
> - while (SDL_GetTicks() < (frameLimit + 16)){}
> -+ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - SDL_GetTicks() >? 0 <? 16);
> ++ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - std::max(std::min(SDL_GetTicks(),
> 0), 16));
> frameLimit = SDL_GetTicks();
> - while (SDL_GetTicks() < (frameLimit + 16)){}
> -+ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - SDL_GetTicks() >? 0 <? 16);
> ++ SDL_Delay(frameLimit + 16 - std::max(std::min(SDL_GetTicks(),
> 0), 16));
> frameLimit = SDL_GetTicks();
Are you sure this is right?
SDL_GetTicks() is greater or equal zero if no overflow happened so you
have:
std::max(0, 16) == 16
Probably you want:
std::min(std::max(SDL_GetTicks(), 0), 16));
(more matches dropped)
_______________________________________________
Pkg-games-devel mailing list
Pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel
