Hi Andreas Bas,
It looks like you fixed all issues during my FOSS4G conference absence.
Thanks a lot!
Pirmin
Am Donnerstag, 19. September 2013, 17.53:55 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
Hi Andreas,
On 09/19/2013 02:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200,
Hi,
hmmm, this came a bit unexpected from looking at the changelog. From
what I can see at
http://packages.debian.org/sid/osgearth
there is no later version than
2.0+dfsg-4
uploaded to Debian. The changelog in Git is mentioning a *lot* of
intermediate versions targeting at unstable
Hi Andreas and Pirmin,
On 09/19/2013 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
hmmm, this came a bit unexpected from looking at the changelog. From
what I can see at
http://packages.debian.org/sid/osgearth
there is no later version than
2.0+dfsg-4
uploaded to Debian. The
Hi Bas,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Which means 2.1.1+dfsg-1 and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about
2.4-1. Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this?
Most outdated GIS packages in Debian are usually more actively
maintained in the
Hi Andreas,
On 09/19/2013 02:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/version to
reflect the destination of the packaging.
Yes, please!
The two Debian releases can be
tagged
5 matches
Mail list logo
