Hi,
why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the
package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim
otherwise.
Ansgar
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the
package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim
otherwise.
Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions. Let
gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2.dsc
gdal_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz
gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2.debian.tar.gz
libgdal1h_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.deb
libgdal-dev_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.deb
gdal-bin_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.deb
binary:libgdal1h is NEW.
gdal_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW.
gdal_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 06:44:40PM +0200, Pitamila wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File , line 1, in
RuntimeError: the sip module implements API v10.0 but the qgis.core module
requires API v8.1
As explained, now qgis requires an update to use the current qtsip lib. I
would
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 +
with message-id e1urxyt-0005k7...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#672738: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #672738,
regarding should depend on libepsilon0 = 0.9.0 probably
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 +
with message-id e1urxyt-0005kc...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#685695: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685695,
regarding gdal must depends on libkml-dev (= 1.3.0)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 +
with message-id e1urxyt-0005ko...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679887: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #679887,
regarding gdal: Port to libpoppler25 API
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 +
with message-id e1urxyt-0005kj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#686014: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686014,
regarding src:gdal: Not parallel-build safe
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
9 matches
Mail list logo