Comments regarding gdal_1.10.0-0~exp1_i386.changes

2013-06-25 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim otherwise. Ansgar ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Comments regarding gdal_1.10.0-0~exp1_i386.changes

2013-06-25 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim otherwise. Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions. Let

Processing of gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.changes

2013-06-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2.dsc gdal_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2.debian.tar.gz libgdal1h_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.deb libgdal-dev_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.deb gdal-bin_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.deb

gdal_1.10.0-0~exp2_i386.changes is NEW

2013-06-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:libgdal1h is NEW. gdal_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW. gdal_1.10.0.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW. Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the

Bug#713893: python-qgis: Couldn't load PyQGIS

2013-06-25 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 06:44:40PM +0200, Pitamila wrote: Traceback (most recent call last): File , line 1, in RuntimeError: the sip module implements API v10.0 but the qgis.core module requires API v8.1 As explained, now qgis requires an update to use the current qtsip lib. I would

Bug#672738: marked as done (should depend on libepsilon0 = 0.9.0 probably)

2013-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 + with message-id e1urxyt-0005k7...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#672738: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #672738, regarding should depend on libepsilon0 = 0.9.0 probably to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#685695: marked as done (gdal must depends on libkml-dev (= 1.3.0))

2013-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 + with message-id e1urxyt-0005kc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#685695: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #685695, regarding gdal must depends on libkml-dev (= 1.3.0) to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#679887: marked as done (gdal: Port to libpoppler25 API)

2013-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 + with message-id e1urxyt-0005ko...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#679887: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #679887, regarding gdal: Port to libpoppler25 API to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#686014: marked as done (src:gdal: Not parallel-build safe)

2013-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:01:25 + with message-id e1urxyt-0005kj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#686014: fixed in gdal 1.10.0-0~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #686014, regarding src:gdal: Not parallel-build safe to be marked as done. This means that you claim