Hi Paolo,
can you please confirm that you understood that it is a packaging
problem to simply list all the license in the debian/copyright file?
Ftpmaster was not saying that the licenses are wrong - they are just
not specified in d/copyright.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014
Dejan,
On 10/20/2014 01:21 PM, Dejan Latinovic wrote:
Is seems that build fail on Broadcom boards,
and pass on cavium and loongson.
I will run build locally to confirm this theory.
Any results from that exercise?
Regards
Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hello Markus,
As I suspected,
build filed on Broadcom and pass on Cavium board.
But I did not figure it out yet what is the reason of this
behavior.
I am getting the same output like this one:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgisarch=mipselver=2.1.4%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1413547028
On 10/23/2014 01:35 PM, Dejan Latinovic wrote:
As I suspected,
build filed on Broadcom and pass on Cavium board.
Okay, thanks for your tests and confirmation.
But I did not figure it out yet what is the reason of this
behavior.
I am getting the same output like this one:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
fnatter-guest pushed a change to branch master
in repository jmapviewer.
from 33f755c mention 'download bing logo at runtime' hack in
README.Debian
new 77537c5 upgrade to standards-version 3.9.6
The 1
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
fnatter-guest pushed a commit to branch master
in repository jmapviewer.
commit 77537c54e829ed0dce2c7290f91d6c52dd8affde
Author: Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net
Date: Thu Oct 23 18:53:43 2014 +0200
upgrade to
Hi Felix,
unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends:
0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libjpeg62-turbo :
On 10/23/2014 08:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends:
0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
Hi Felix,
hello Andreas,
unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depends:
0 packages upgraded, 132 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 62.8 MB/92.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 210 MB will be used.
The following
Hi Bas,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
[no love for enigmail today]
try mutt ;-)
switched to public discussion anyway.
For very strange reasons I get
0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB
Hi Bas
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1
build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~).
Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue:
git fetch origin
Hi Andreas,
On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1
build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~).
Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to
12 matches
Mail list logo
