Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-11-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:17:12PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds are done with gdal? Done Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-11-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10/25/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in experimental should not be that

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. -The following packages have unmet dependencies: - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts:

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/24/2014 11:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in:

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. -The following packages have unmet dependencies: - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (=

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: [no love for enigmail today] try mutt ;-) switched to public discussion anyway. For very strange reasons I get 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: git fetch origin

Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-12 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgdal-grass Package name: libgdal-grass Version : 1.11.1-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com URL :