Re: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-01-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:17:39AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 01/12/2014 11:48 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the pool. It looks like the initial gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz was not checked out

Re: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-01-13 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:05:16AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Yes. I think enabling usual git-buildpackage to create a package resulting in the very same orig.tar.gz as it is on the Debian mirror should be the way to go. Just tell me if this is fixed and I should do a rebuild. Just as a

Re: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-01-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:13:39PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Just as a side note I use git-buildpackage for all packages in d-gis tree. Further investigation shows that a missing --pristine-tar was not the cause. My commit of the new upstream version deleted the .gitignore file,

Re: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-01-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/13/2014 11:26 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:13:39PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Just as a side note I use git-buildpackage for all packages in d-gis tree. Further investigation shows that a missing --pristine-tar was not the cause. My commit of the new

Re: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-01-12 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/12/2014 11:48 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the pool. It looks like the initial gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz was not checked out from the pristine-tar branch. I downloaded the orig.tar.gz from snapshot.debian.org, and