Dear FTP masters,
Thanks for taking time to review pycsw.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
One result of the discussion about tinyows was that OGC schemas don't fall
under the Software Notice but the Document Notice. This makes them
non-free
Hi Johan,
On 11/19/2014 10:08 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
Just for clarity, pycsw only contains the schemas, and not the
testcases mentioned for tinyOWS.
I would like to point out that regarding these schemas there is
actually no difference between the licenses used by W3C and OGC (apart
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Johan,
On 11/19/2014 10:08 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
Just for clarity, pycsw only contains the schemas, and not the
testcases mentioned for tinyOWS.
I would like to point out that regarding these schemas
On 11/28/2014 10:14 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Johan,
On 11/19/2014 10:08 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
Just for clarity, pycsw only contains the schemas, and not the
testcases mentioned for tinyOWS.
I
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
One result of the discussion about tinyows was that OGC schemas don't fall
under the Software Notice but the Document Notice. This makes them non-free
(no modification) and tinyows had to move to non-free.
I am afraid that pycsw
One result of the discussion about tinyows was that OGC schemas don't fall
under the Software Notice but the Document Notice. This makes them
non-free
(no modification) and tinyows had to move to non-free.
I am afraid that pycsw has to do this as well.
That seems to be the wrong way around.
6 matches
Mail list logo
