FYI: Bug#332579: Please remove kaffe binaries on mipsel

Hi all, I now requested removal of mipsel binaries form etch so kaffe can propagate to testing once built on the remaining architectures. Wolfgang Original Message Subject: Bug#332579: Please remove kaffe binaries on mipsel Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:33:01 UTC

Re: FYI: Bug#332579: Please remove kaffe binaries on mipsel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang Baer wrote: Hi all, I now requested removal of mipsel binaries form etch so kaffe can propagate to testing once built on the remaining architectures. Many thanks. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap:

Processing of japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1_powerpc.changes

japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1.dsc japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006.orig.tar.gz japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1.diff.gz japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian

japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1_powerpc.changes is NEW

(new) japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1.diff.gz optional devel (new) japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1.dsc optional devel (new) japitools_0.9.5+cvs20051006-1_all.deb optional devel Java API compatibility testing tools It consists of two simple tools designed to test for compatibility between Java APIs.

Processing of jflex_1.4.1-1_powerpc.changes

jflex_1.4.1-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jflex_1.4.1-1.dsc jflex_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz jflex_1.4.1-1.diff.gz jflex_1.4.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers

libcommons-discovery-java_0.2-8_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libcommons-discovery-java_0.2-8.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcommons-discovery-java/libcommons-discovery-java_0.2-8.diff.gz libcommons-discovery-java_0.2-8.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcommons-discovery-java/libcommons-discovery-java_0.2-8.dsc libcommons-discovery-java_0.2-8_all.deb

jflex_1.4.1-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: jflex_1.4.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.1-1.diff.gz jflex_1.4.1-1.dsc to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.1-1.dsc jflex_1.4.1-1_all.deb to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.1-1_all.deb jflex_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz Announcing to

Processing of libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3_powerpc.changes

libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3.dsc libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3.diff.gz libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

velocity_1.4-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: velocity-doc_1.4-3_all.deb to pool/main/v/velocity/velocity-doc_1.4-3_all.deb velocity_1.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/v/velocity/velocity_1.4-3.diff.gz velocity_1.4-3.dsc to pool/main/v/velocity/velocity_1.4-3.dsc velocity_1.4-3_all.deb to pool/main/v/velocity/velocity_1.4-3_all.deb

libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcommons-logging-java/libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3.diff.gz libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcommons-logging-java/libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3.dsc libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-3_all.deb to

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

Nathanael Nerode wrote: Andreas Barth wrote: Actually, there is one criterion missing: Does this bug really hurt us bad (enough)? And my current answer to this is no, but of course, you might want to persuade me. :) ... So, I think we can say that this bug is even forwarded to upstream, as

FYI: This is important

Title: cylindric try awe but admonish a algaecide athe biddable on vacuo in rasp see! cinnamon and cantonese or phalanger sometry ortega in bursitis some elliott ,the possessor or puissant but zero but edgewise onthe insatiable a toby see corinth and. not so kliiq hier Nice, Anderson Novak

Re: Please reenable GCJ on mips

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:16:28AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I begin to get the picture. Apparently the MIPS ABI is just plain broken. It contains some sort of impassable hard limit on relocation table size, breaking random packages at random times with no possible fix. Nobody can

Bug#332643: java-package doesn't create a .changes file

Package: java-package Version: 0.26 Severity: minor Hi, just build the jdk1.5.0 update5 package with java-package --changes --full-name Andreas Pakulat --email [EMAIL PROTECTED] jdk and all I get is a .deb, not .changes file. Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable

Processing of libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_powerpc.changes

libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.dsc libtoolbar-java_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.diff.gz libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Processing of libi18n-java_0.1.3-1_powerpc.changes

libi18n-java_0.1.3-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libi18n-java_0.1.3-1.dsc libi18n-java_0.1.3.orig.tar.gz libi18n-java_0.1.3-1.diff.gz libi18n-java_0.1.3-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_powerpc.changes is NEW

(new) libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.diff.gz optional libs WARNING: Already present in contrib distribution. (new) libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.dsc optional libs WARNING: Already present in contrib distribution. (new) libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_all.deb optional libs WARNING: Already present in contrib

Processing of libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1_powerpc.changes

libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1.dsc libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2.orig.tar.gz libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1.diff.gz libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1_all.deb Greetings,

libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1.diff.gz libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1.dsc libgef-java_0.11.99.0.12.beta2-1_all.deb to

libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libtoolbar-java/libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.diff.gz libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.dsc to pool/main/libt/libtoolbar-java/libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1.dsc libtoolbar-java_1.1.0-1_all.deb to

Bug#274850: marked as done (libtoolbar-java 0.2 builds on amd64)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:59:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#274850: fixed in libtoolbar-java 1.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#306779: marked as done (libtoolbar-java: Please support the JAVA_HOME directories used by java-package)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:59:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306779: fixed in libtoolbar-java 1.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#332643: java-package doesn't create a .changes file

On 07.10.05 15:14:51, Barry Hawkins wrote: Andreas Pakulat wrote: [...] just build the jdk1.5.0 update5 package with java-package --changes --full-name Andreas Pakulat --email [EMAIL PROTECTED] jdk and all I get is a .deb, not .changes file. [...] Thanks for your use of Debian

Bug#332643: marked as done (java-package doesn't create a .changes file)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:46:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332643: java-package doesn't create a .changes file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

私の妻を抱いてやって頂けません か？私は輸入代理店経営、身元も明かせ ます。

私は正志43歳。妻は美保子28歳です。 私共の夫婦には問題があります。問題といいますのは、お恥ずかしながら私が男性として機能できないということなのです。 しかも先日、私の海外赴任が決まりました。 この機に、その間妻の相手をして頂きたいと思いまして、勝手ながら、貴方に連絡させて頂いたのです。 経緯を話せば長くなる上、ご迷惑でしたら誠に失礼なメールですので経緯についてはご返信をいただけたら・・という事で。 今は関係を持っていただけるかどうかお返事いただけますか？ イエスかノーで結構です。 イエスであれば、美保子の写真をお送りし、謝礼についてや、お逢いする日時を決めたいと思います。