Bug#406780: tomcat5: NullPointerException on loading FacesServlet (JSF)

2007-01-14 Thread Marcus Better
Can you reproduce it without a security manager? Can you check if it works with tomcat5.5? Marcus pgpMxucWQ4B3G.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#406780: tomcat5: NullPointerException on loading FacesServlet (JSF)

2007-01-14 Thread Marko Randjelovic
Marcus Better wrote: Can you reproduce it without a security manager? Can you check if it works with tomcat5.5? Marcus I toggled TOMCAT5_SECURITY to no in /etc/default/tomcat5 and restarted tomcat5. Now I get similar error. === 2007-01-14 12:46:19

Bug#406780: - Similar bug report on issues.apache.org

2007-01-14 Thread Marko Randjelovic
Maybe following link could help. It is about tomcat 5.5.20, the same version as Debian tomcat5.5. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41112 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#395400: please Provides: jar for the sdk packages

2007-01-14 Thread Jon Dowland
Apologies for the delay in responding. On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: Users don't usually build the package themselves, do they? And if they do, they are supposed to install the required build environment. In this case the required dependency (fastjar) is

Processed: Re: Bug#406780: - Similar bug report on issues.apache.org

2007-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 406780 moreinfo Bug#406780: tomcat5: NullPointerException on loading FacesServlet (JSF) There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#406780: - Similar bug report on issues.apache.org

2007-01-14 Thread Marcus Better
tag 406780 moreinfo thanks Maybe following link could help. It is about tomcat 5.5.20, the same version as Debian tomcat5.5. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41112 Do you think you could try it with an upstream distribution of Tomcat? Marcus pgpG9kRCZx8X1.pgp Description:

Bug#406780: - Similar bug report on issues.apache.org

2007-01-14 Thread Marko Randjelovic
Marcus Better wrote: Do you think you could try it with an upstream distribution of Tomcat? Marcus I tried version from unstable, but it doesn't work at all. It doesn't even leave anything in log files. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Anybody working on Sun's JavaHelp .jar (GPLed)

2007-01-14 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hi, my haploview ITP needs JavaHelp which is distributed as a GPL jar from Sun at https://javahelp.dev.java.net/. Has anybody of yours worked on that already? I had a look at the source and it seems indeed fine. Only the demo files outside the src.jar are licensed differently (more freely).

Processing of ecj-bootstrap_3.2.1-5_m68k.changes

2007-01-14 Thread Archive Administrator
ecj-bootstrap_3.2.1-5_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.1-5_m68k.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Re: Anybody working on Sun's JavaHelp .jar (GPLed)

2007-01-14 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote: Has anybody of yours worked on that already? (The canonical place to avoid work duplication / to reuse work on Debian packages should be WNPP. :) -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

ecj-bootstrap_3.2.1-5_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2007-01-14 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.1-5_m68k.deb to pool/main/e/ecj-bootstrap/ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.1-5_m68k.deb Override entries for your package: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.1-5_m68k.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___

Re: Anybody working on Sun's JavaHelp .jar (GPLed)

2007-01-14 Thread Steffen Moeller
On Sunday 14 January 2007 22:18, Loïc Minier wrote: On Sun, Jan 14, 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote: Has anybody of yours worked on that already? (The canonical place to avoid work duplication / to reuse work on Debian packages should be WNPP. :) Done that, have not found anything, asked

Processing of classpath_0.92-4_i386.changes

2007-01-14 Thread Archive Administrator
classpath_0.92-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: classpath_0.92-4.dsc classpath_0.92-4.diff.gz classpath-common_0.92-4_all.deb classpath-common-unzipped_0.92-4_all.deb classpath-doc_0.92-4_all.deb jikes-classpath_0.92-4_all.deb

classpath_0.92-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-01-14 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: classpath-common-unzipped_0.92-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-common-unzipped_0.92-4_all.deb classpath-common_0.92-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-common_0.92-4_all.deb classpath-doc_0.92-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-doc_0.92-4_all.deb

Bug#372851: marked as done (classpath: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD (due to missing build-depends on xul-dev))

2007-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:32:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#372851: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of cacao_0.97-3_i386.changes

2007-01-14 Thread Archive Administrator
cacao_0.97-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cacao_0.97-3.dsc cacao_0.97-3.diff.gz cacao_0.97-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Bug#387318: marked as done (Native library `gconfpeer' not found)

2007-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:32:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#387318: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now