Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 412478 jsvc Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required Bug reassigned from package `tomcat5.5' to `jsvc'. retitle 412478 jsvc: clarify error message if capabilities module is missing Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load

Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

Hello, I wanted to ask what you guys think about creating a package for just the extensions Norman Walsh wrote for docbook-xsl. The Java-classes can be found at http://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/docbook/trunk/xsl/extensions/. Do you see a way to package them? It would complete the

Processed: tagging 412478

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 tags 412478 upstream Bug#412478: jsvc: clarify error message if capabilities module is missing There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 412478

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 tags 412478 + upstream Bug#412478: jsvc: clarify error message if capabilities module is missing Tags were: upstream Tags added: upstream End of message, stopping processing here.

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

[moving discussion to debian-java list] Daniel Leidert wrote: I wanted to ask what you guys think about creating a package for just the extensions Norman Walsh wrote for docbook-xsl. The Java-classes can be found at http://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/docbook/trunk/xsl/extensions/. Do

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: [moving discussion to debian-java list] Ok. I'm not subscribed to the debian-java list, so please include a CC to my address if answering from this list Daniel Leidert wrote: I wanted to ask what you guys think about creating

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert: Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Marcus Better: [moving discussion to debian-java list] Ok. I'm not subscribed to the debian-java list, so please include a CC to my address if answering from this list I'm

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

Daniel Leidert wrote: Update: The docbook-xsl upstream is willing to release a separate (source-)tarball for the extension Java classes Ok, doesn't make much difference from a packaging perspective though. Marcus ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing

Re: Saxon/Xalan extensions written by Norman Walsh for docbook-xsl

Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007-02-27 11:47 +0100: Update: The docbook-xsl upstream is willing to release a separate (source-)tarball for the extension Java classes (maybe as docbook-xsl-java?). (I contacted Daniel about this after reading a message he posted over on the docbook-apps

Processed: Re: Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 412478 +wontfix Bug#412478: jsvc: clarify error message if capabilities module is missing Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required

tag 412478 +wontfix thanks On 2/27/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tag 412478 -wontfix +upstream Marcus, I think you were right about the wontfix tag. Also, if it's upstream fix the bug, then we can close it. The wontfix tag means we don't want to fix it in the package, but if

Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required

clone 412478 -1 reassign -1 tomcat55 retitle -1 tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required severity -1 wishlist tag -1 -upstream tag 412478 -wontfix thanks Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I think you were right about the wontfix tag. Hmm, did you notice that I reassigned the bug to jsvc and

Processed: reassign 412690 to tomcat5.5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 reassign 412690 tomcat5.5 Bug#412690: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required Warning: Unknown package 'tomcat55' Bug reassigned from package `tomcat55' to `tomcat5.5'.

Bug#412716: Request upgrade of ant package to 1.7.x from 1.6.x

Package: ant Version: 1.6.5-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: etch sid Ant 1.7 was released in 2006-Dec and has major functionality improvements. It would be greatly beneficial if Debian unstable/sid and hopefully etch/testing would upgrade from 1.6.x to 1.7.x.