commons-daemon_1.0.2~svn20061127-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
commons-daemon_1.0.2~svn20061127-6.dsc
commons-daemon_1.0.2~svn20061127-6.diff.gz
libcommons-daemon-java_1.0.2~svn20061127-6_all.deb
jsvc_1.0.2~svn20061127-6_i386.deb
Greetings,
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
jsvc_1.0.2~svn20061127-6_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says
net.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 424504 ecj
Bug#424504: eclipse - FTBFS: 46 problems (3 errors, 43 warnings)
Bug reassigned from package `eclipse' to `ecj'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
libgnumail-java_1.1.2-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgnumail-java_1.1.2-1.dsc
libgnumail-java_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz
libgnumail-java_1.1.2-1.diff.gz
libgnumail-java_1.1.2-1_all.deb
libgnumail-java-doc_1.1.2-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your
reassign 424504 ecj
thanks
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:51:40AM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.1-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for
(new) libjibx-java-doc_1.0.1-1_all.deb optional contrib/doc
Documentation for libjibx-java
This package contains documentation, javadocs (or should I say gjdocs) and
tutorial code for JiBX.
(new) libjibx-java_1.0.1-1.diff.gz optional contrib/libs
(new) libjibx-java_1.0.1-1.dsc optional
jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1.dsc
jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
libjarjar-java_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
libjarjar-java-doc_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
libjibx-java_1.0.1-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libjibx-java_1.0.1-1.dsc
libjibx-java_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
libjibx-java_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
libjibx-java_1.0.1-1_all.deb
libjibx-java-doc_1.0.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
On 5/16/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Could not start Jetty servlet engine because no Java Development Kit
(JDK) was found. Please download and install JDK 1.3 or higher and set
JAVA_HOME in /etc/default/jetty to the JDK's installation directory.
But I have gcj,
(new) jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz optional libs
(new) jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1.dsc optional libs
(new) jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz optional libs
(new) libjarjar-java-doc_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1_all.deb optional doc
repackage third-party jars
Utility that makes it easy to repackage Java
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 282022 pending
Bug#282022: ITP: player -- A networked robot/sensor device interface
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 406363 pending
Bug#406363: python-egenix-mxdatetime:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 421967 moreinfo
Bug#421967: init script doesn't honor /etc/default/tomcat5.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 424465 pending
Bug#424465: tomcat5.5 - FTBFS: 36 problems (5 errors, 31 warnings)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-4
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed that leaving TOMCAT5_USER empty in /etc/default/tomcat5.5 is not
preventing the launcher from starting Tomcat during boot. This was working with
Tomcat 5.0 in Debian.
The current init
On Fri, May 18, 2007, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
How did you set the JAVA_HOME variable in /etc/default/jetty? I mean
which value did you put in JAVA_HOME?
I didn't set anything.
--
Loïc Minier
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 18:51:55 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421967: init script doesn't honor /etc/default/tomcat5.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Accepted:
libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.20-5_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.20-5_all.deb
tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.20-5_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.20-5_all.deb
tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.20-5_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.20-5_all.deb
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402603: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402879: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402603: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402603: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413845: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424465: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406614: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411137: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412479: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: fop
Version: 1:0.93.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
if I use fop to produce pdfs from asciioc I get a exception. If I use 0.20.5-8
everything works as expected. I'm no fop/xml expert so please enlight me where
the problem is.
Here the exception:
SCHWERWIEGEND: Exception
FYI: The status of the jta source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.5+dfsg-1
Current version: 2.6+dfsg-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libjazzy-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.5.1-1
Current version: 0.5.1a-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the lucene2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 2.1.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the plexus-interactivity-api source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.0+svn5974-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See
FYI: The status of the plexus-component-api source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.0+svn6316-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See
32 matches
Mail list logo
