[Fwd: Re: [pkg-java] r3873 - in trunk/maven2/debian: . patches]

Woops - meant to send this to the list... Original Message Subject: Re: [pkg-java] r3873 - in trunk/maven2/debian: . patches Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:23:25 +0100 From: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Bug#433906: kaffe: not binNMU safe

Package: kaffe Version: 2:1.1.7-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch Please apply the attached patch to make your package binNMU safe. A patch is attched. Notice kaffe's dependiencies were changed from = to = to support later binary builds. If you want to tighten it, you can use the example at

Bug#431472: marked as done (libxerces2-java: new upstream 2.9.0)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:57:59 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libxerces2-java: new upstream 2.9.0: done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

ecj_3.3.0-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.3.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.3.0-2_all.deb ecj-bootstrap_3.3.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-bootstrap_3.3.0-2_all.deb ecj-gcj_3.3.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-gcj_3.3.0-2_i386.deb ecj_3.3.0-2.diff.gz to

Bug#431472: marked as done (libxerces2-java: new upstream 2.9.0)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:47:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#431472 closed by Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] (libxerces2-java: new upstream 2.9.0: done) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#397602: marked as done (fop: FTBFS: should use the sun-java5-* packages instead of j2sdk1.4)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:43:36 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fop does not ftbfs, it need non-free jvm has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

maven-ant-helper_3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: maven-ant-helper_3.dsc to pool/main/m/maven-ant-helper/maven-ant-helper_3.dsc maven-ant-helper_3.tar.gz to pool/main/m/maven-ant-helper/maven-ant-helper_3.tar.gz maven-ant-helper_3_all.deb to pool/main/m/maven-ant-helper/maven-ant-helper_3_all.deb Override entries for your

maven-ant-helper_2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: maven-ant-helper_2.dsc to pool/main/m/maven-ant-helper/maven-ant-helper_2.dsc maven-ant-helper_2.tar.gz to pool/main/m/maven-ant-helper/maven-ant-helper_2.tar.gz maven-ant-helper_2_all.deb to pool/main/m/maven-ant-helper/maven-ant-helper_2_all.deb Override entries for your

classworlds 1.1-alpha-2-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the classworlds source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.1-1.1 Current version: 1.1-alpha-2-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more

plexus-container-default 1.0-alpha-9-stable-1-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the plexus-container-default source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0+svn6351-1 Current version: 1.0-alpha-9-stable-1-2 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See

Re: plexus-i18n_1.0-beta-6-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi Maintainer, rejected, i cant find the license info in the tarball. The only thing i find is one file that contains Apache 1.1, nothing else, and that was a file from the testsuite. Please talk with upstream to enhance this and then reupload. Thanks. Woops - why

Greetings

Hello, I am Tawfiq Issa, a merchant and I have been diagnosed with malignant cancer of the esophagus. It has defiled all forms of treatment and i have a few months to live according to medical experts. i regret that I have not lived my life so well, as I never really cared for anyone, but my