jftp_1.51~pre4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jftp_1.51~pre4-1.dsc
jftp_1.51~pre4.orig.tar.gz
jftp_1.51~pre4-1.diff.gz
jftp_1.51~pre4-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
Accepted:
jftp_1.51~pre4-1.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/j/jftp/jftp_1.51~pre4-1.diff.gz
jftp_1.51~pre4-1.dsc
to pool/contrib/j/jftp/jftp_1.51~pre4-1.dsc
jftp_1.51~pre4-1_all.deb
to pool/contrib/j/jftp/jftp_1.51~pre4-1_all.deb
jftp_1.51~pre4.orig.tar.gz
to
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3.dsc
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3.diff.gz
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4.dsc
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4.diff.gz
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
pkg-java-maintainers
libcommons-logging-java_1.1.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libcommons-logging-java_1.1.1-1.dsc
libcommons-logging-java_1.1.1.orig.tar.gz
libcommons-logging-java_1.1.1-1.diff.gz
libcommons-logging-java_1.1.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your
Accepted:
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/libd/libdtdparser-java/libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3.diff.gz
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3.dsc
to pool/main/libd/libdtdparser-java/libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3.dsc
libdtdparser-java_1.21a-3_all.deb
to
Accepted:
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/libo/liboro-java/liboro-java_2.0.8a-4.diff.gz
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4.dsc
to pool/main/libo/liboro-java/liboro-java_2.0.8a-4.dsc
liboro-java_2.0.8a-4_all.deb
to pool/main/libo/liboro-java/liboro-java_2.0.8a-4_all.deb
Override entries for
bouncycastle_1.38-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bouncycastle_1.38-1.dsc
bouncycastle_1.38.orig.tar.gz
bouncycastle_1.38-1.diff.gz
libbcprov-java_1.38-1_all.deb
libbcprov-java-doc_1.38-1_all.deb
libbcmail-java_1.38-1_all.deb
Accepted:
bouncycastle_1.38-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/bouncycastle/bouncycastle_1.38-1.diff.gz
bouncycastle_1.38-1.dsc
to pool/main/b/bouncycastle/bouncycastle_1.38-1.dsc
bouncycastle_1.38.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bouncycastle/bouncycastle_1.38.orig.tar.gz
libbcmail-java-doc_1.38-1_all.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
package libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tomcat5.5-admin libtomcat5.5-java
tomcat5.5-webapps tomcat5.5
tags 456608 +
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for tomcat5.5.
CVE-2007-5342[0]:
| The default catalina.policy in the JULI logging component in Apache
| Tomcat 5.5.9 through 5.5.25 and 6.0.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
package libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tomcat5.5-admin libtomcat5.5-java
tomcat5.5-webapps tomcat5.5
tags 458237 +
tomcat5.5_5.5.25-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tomcat5.5_5.5.25-4.dsc
tomcat5.5_5.5.25-4.diff.gz
tomcat5.5_5.5.25-4_all.deb
libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.25-4_all.deb
tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.25-4_all.deb
tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.25-4_all.deb
Greetings,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote:
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-2
Severity: important
The script should warn the user that has no rights for this
operation.
As you may notice I use my own jdk package but I don't think
this has an effect on this
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3.dsc
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3.diff.gz
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.25-4_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.25-4_all.deb
tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.25-4_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.25-4_all.deb
tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.25-4_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.25-4_all.deb
Accepted:
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/libb/libbsf-java/libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3.diff.gz
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3.dsc
to pool/main/libb/libbsf-java/libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3.dsc
libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308a-3_all.deb
to
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:32:22 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456608: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.25-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:32:22 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#458237: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.25-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libsaxon-java
Version: 1:6.5.5-1.1
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to ask you, if you could/would be so kind to provide a
package with native code for GCJ/GIJ. This would help me a lot to speed
up the building of the docbook-defguide
Package: libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java
Version: 1.1-8
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to ask you, if you could/would be so kind to provide a
package with native code for GCJ/GIJ. This would help me a lot to speed
up the building of the
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Package: libsaxon-java
Version: 1:6.5.5-1.1
Severity: wishlist
I would like to ask you, if you could/would be so kind to provide a
package with native code for GCJ/GIJ. This would help me a lot to speed
up the building of the
Dalibor Topic wrote:
I'm not sure if our ideas are really opposed:
Certainly not, I'm all for doing rebuilds of reverse dependencies if
possible. So do you have any plans on how to implement this? Should the
rebuilding be done before uploading a new version, or will that take too
long? Or should
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:35:54PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
I'm not sure if our ideas are really opposed:
Certainly not, I'm all for doing rebuilds of reverse dependencies if
possible. So do you have any plans on how to implement this? Should the
rebuilding be done
FYI: The status of the glassfish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2+b58g-2
Current version: 2+b58g-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
25 matches
Mail list logo