Processing of glib-java_0.4.2-9_amd64.changes

glib-java_0.4.2-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glib-java_0.4.2-9.dsc glib-java_0.4.2-9.diff.gz libglib-java_0.4.2-9_all.deb libglib-java-doc_0.4.2-9_all.deb libglib-jni_0.4.2-9_amd64.deb libglib-cni_0.4.2-9_amd64.deb

glib-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libglib-java-dev_0.4.2-9_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and

glib-java_0.4.2-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: glib-java_0.4.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glib-java/glib-java_0.4.2-9.diff.gz glib-java_0.4.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glib-java/glib-java_0.4.2-9.dsc libglib-cni_0.4.2-9_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/glib-java/libglib-cni_0.4.2-9_amd64.deb libglib-java-dev_0.4.2-9_amd64.deb to

Bug#462500: marked as done (glib-java: FTBFS: src/jni/jg_jnu.h:8:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:02:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462500: fixed in glib-java 0.4.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of cairo-java_1.0.8-8_amd64.changes

cairo-java_1.0.8-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cairo-java_1.0.8-8.dsc cairo-java_1.0.8-8.diff.gz libcairo-java_1.0.8-8_all.deb libcairo-java-doc_1.0.8-8_all.deb libcairo-jni_1.0.8-8_amd64.deb libcairo-cni_1.0.8-8_amd64.deb

cairo-java_1.0.8-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cairo-java_1.0.8-8.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cairo-java/cairo-java_1.0.8-8.diff.gz cairo-java_1.0.8-8.dsc to pool/main/c/cairo-java/cairo-java_1.0.8-8.dsc libcairo-cni_1.0.8-8_amd64.deb to pool/main/c/cairo-java/libcairo-cni_1.0.8-8_amd64.deb libcairo-java-dev_1.0.8-8_amd64.deb to

cairo-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libcairo-java-dev_1.0.8-8_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct

Bug#462644: FTBFS: src/jni/gtk_java.c:15:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory

Package: libgtk-java Version: 2.10.2-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 This is the same kind of bug as #462500 and #462506. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

libgtk-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libgtk-java-dev_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and

libgtk-java_2.10.2-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libgtk-cni_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtk-java/libgtk-cni_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb libgtk-java-dev_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtk-java/libgtk-java-dev_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb libgtk-java-doc_2.10.2-6_all.deb to

Bug#462644: marked as done (FTBFS: src/jni/gtk_java.c:15:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:02:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462644: fixed in libgtk-java 2.10.2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of libgconf-java_2.12.6-4_amd64.changes

libgconf-java_2.12.6-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgconf-java_2.12.6-4.dsc libgconf-java_2.12.6-4.diff.gz libgconf-java_2.12.6-4_all.deb libgconf-java-doc_2.12.6-4_all.deb libgconf-jni_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb libgconf-cni_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb

libgconf-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libgconf-java-dev_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct

libgconf-java_2.12.6-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libgconf-cni_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libgconf-java/libgconf-cni_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb libgconf-java-dev_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libgconf-java/libgconf-java-dev_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb libgconf-java-doc_2.12.6-4_all.deb to

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: reassign 432541 gcj-4.2 retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins merge 432539 432541 thanks Hi, after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that the

Bug#440582: marked as done (Typos in package description)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:02:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#440582: fixed in libgconf-java 2.12.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 17:12 +0100, Michael Koch a écrit : I have just tried this with SUN JDK 6, Icedtea, gcj 4.3, jamvm and cacao with the following result: SUN JDK 6: Just works. gcj-4.3: No output at all. Returns with exit code 13. icedtea: No output at all. Returns with exit

Processing of libglade-java_2.12.8-4_amd64.changes

libglade-java_2.12.8-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libglade-java_2.12.8-4.dsc libglade-java_2.12.8-4.diff.gz libglade-java_2.12.8-4_all.deb libglade-java-doc_2.12.8-4_all.deb libglade-jni_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb libglade-cni_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb

libglade-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libglade-java-dev_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct

libglade-java_2.12.8-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libglade-cni_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libglade-java/libglade-cni_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb libglade-java-dev_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libglade-java/libglade-java-dev_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb libglade-java-doc_2.12.8-4_all.deb to

Bug#440583: marked as done (Typos in package description)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:17:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#440583: fixed in libglade-java 2.12.8-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of libgnome-java_2.12.7-4_amd64.changes

libgnome-java_2.12.7-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgnome-java_2.12.7-4.dsc libgnome-java_2.12.7-4.diff.gz libgnome-java_2.12.7-4_all.deb libgnome-java-doc_2.12.7-4_all.deb libgnome-jni_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb libgnome-cni_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb

Bug#440584: marked as done (Typos in package description)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:02:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#440584: fixed in libgnome-java 2.12.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

libgnome-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libgnome-java-dev_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct

libgnome-java_2.12.7-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libgnome-cni_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-cni_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb libgnome-java-dev_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-java-dev_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb libgnome-java-doc_2.12.7-4_all.deb to

Processing of libvte-java_0.12.3-4_amd64.changes

libvte-java_0.12.3-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libvte-java_0.12.3-4.dsc libvte-java_0.12.3-4.diff.gz libvte-java_0.12.3-4_all.deb libvte-java-doc_0.12.3-4_all.deb libvte-jni_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb libvte-cni_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb

libvte-java_0.12.3-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libvte-cni_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libv/libvte-java/libvte-cni_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb libvte-java-dev_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/libv/libvte-java/libvte-java-dev_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb libvte-java-doc_0.12.3-4_all.deb to

libvte-java override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libvte-java-dev_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and

Bug#440586: marked as done (Typos in package description)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#440586: fixed in libvte-java 0.12.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is