Processing of pj_0.0~20080513-1_amd64.changes

pj_0.0~20080513-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pj_0.0~20080513-1.dsc pj_0.0~20080513.orig.tar.gz pj_0.0~20080513-1.diff.gz libpj-java_0.0~20080513-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

pj_0.0~20080513-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libpj-java_0.0~20080513-1_all.deb to pool/contrib/p/pj/libpj-java_0.0~20080513-1_all.deb pj_0.0~20080513-1.diff.gz to pool/contrib/p/pj/pj_0.0~20080513-1.diff.gz pj_0.0~20080513-1.dsc to pool/contrib/p/pj/pj_0.0~20080513-1.dsc pj_0.0~20080513.orig.tar.gz to

Re: Some [more] packages blocked for the gcc-defaults transition

* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 28 May 2008 15:25:26 +0200]: Hello, gcc-defaults is almost ready to migrate to testing (finally!), and since I would really hate to see this delayed any further, I've put one of these block uploads thingies in place for the packages below. Thanks in advance for your

Processing of antlr_2.7.7-6_amd64.changes

antlr_2.7.7-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: antlr_2.7.7-6.dsc antlr_2.7.7-6.diff.gz libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-6_all.deb antlr-doc_2.7.7-6_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-6_all.deb libantlr-dev_2.7.7-6_amd64.deb cantlr_2.7.7-6_amd64.deb Greetings,

antlr_2.7.7-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: antlr-doc_2.7.7-6_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr-doc_2.7.7-6_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-6.diff.gz to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-6.diff.gz antlr_2.7.7-6.dsc to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-6.dsc antlr_2.7.7-6_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-6_all.deb

Bug#483558: marked as done (antlr: builds arch:any package in binary-indep (or libantlr2.7-cil should be arch:all))

Your message dated Fri, 30 May 2008 20:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#483558: fixed in antlr 2.7.7-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #483558, regarding antlr: builds arch:any package in binary-indep (or libantlr2.7-cil should be arch:all) to be marked as

Bug#483748: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libservlet2.4-java-gcj | 5.0.30-7 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483738: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: bsh-gcj |2.0b4-7 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s)

Bug#483746: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libmx4j-java-gcj |3.0.2-1 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483749: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libxalan2-java-gcj |2.7.0-5 | alpha libxalan2-java-gcj |2.7.1-1 | hppa libxsltc-java-gcj |2.7.0-5 | alpha libxsltc-java-gcj |2.7.1-1 | hppa Note that the package(s) have

Bug#483747: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: librepository-java-gcj |0.1.4-2 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483745: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libjaxp1.3-java-gcj | 1.3.04-2 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483735: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ant-gcj |1.7.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa ant-optional-gcj |1.7.0-5 | alpha, arm, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not)

Bug#483737: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libbcmail-java-gcj | 1.33-4 | alpha libbcmail-java-gcj | 1.39-1 | hppa libbcpg-java-gcj | 1.33-4 | alpha libbcpg-java-gcj | 1.39-1 | hppa libbcprov-java-gcj | 1.33-4 |

Bug#483736: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libaxis-java-gcj | 1.4-3 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483744: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libjaxp1.2-java-gcj | 1.2.01-2 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#477363: Seconded

Tomcat also doesn't start for me without including commons-logging to Tomcat's class path. I also think the severity of this bug should be raised, Tomcat is not usable like this at all. Jan-Pascal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#475103: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gjdoc |0.7.8-9 | alpha, arm, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483752: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libsac-java-gcj | 1.3-1 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The

Bug#483751: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java-gcj | 1.2-1 | alpha, hppa Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is

Processed: Re: Bug#340998: why wontfix?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unarchive 340998 Unarchived Bug 340998 Unarchived Bug 341407 reopen 340998 Bug#340998: libswt3.2-gtk-java: Should not conflict with libswt-gtk-3.2-java Bug#341407: azureus: incompatible with eclipse Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks

Bug#340998: why wontfix?

Matthias Why won't you apply Shaun's 1-line patch and fix this bug? if the azureus/swt-gtk maintainer insists on shipping a private copy of swt-gtk, it's his problem; it was often discussed in the past. As far as I understand, it is eclipse shipping its private copy, not azureus. But anyway: