Package: cantlr
Version: 2.7.7-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The cantlr package cannot be installed as it depends on antlr-gcj, that
doesn't exists.
It should depend on libantlr-java-gcj
This has been fixed in Ubuntu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 504050 504068
Bug#504050: cantlr: depends on nonexistent antlr-gcj (vs. libantlr-java-gcj)
Bug#504068: cantlr depends on antlr-gcj that doesn't exists. It should depends
on libantlr-java-gcj
Merged 504050 504068.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 503800 +patch
Bug#503800: libgdata-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 503800 +patch
thanks
add
ANT_OPTS := -Dant.build.javac.source=1.5 -Dant.build.javac.target=1.5
immeditately after the line that sets DEB_ANT_BUILDFILE in debian/rules
to fix this bug
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
found 503800 1.20.0-1
thanks
btw this bug also affects the version in lenny (which is built using the
propietry sun jdk)
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 503800 1.20.0-1
Bug#503800: libgdata-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
Bug marked as found in version 1.20.0-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:22:41 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line re: aspectwerkz2: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503769,
regarding aspectwerkz2: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:49:20 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line re: commons-csv: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503774,
regarding commons-csv: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:00:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line re:easymock: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503772,
regarding easymock: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 503775 2+b58g-3
Bug#503775: glassfish: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
Bug marked as found in version 2+b58g-3.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
found 503775 2+b58g-3
thanks
ok it seems some of the binaries generated from this source have the
classfile version issue but not others. It looks like
Also given that this package only migrated over from contrib recently I
strongly suspect that the dependencies on the binary packages would
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:53:49 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#503790: lucene2: java bytecode / java runtime version
mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503790,
regarding lucene2: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:57:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#503797: solr: java bytecode / java runtime version
mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503797,
regarding solr: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
The jar contains a mixture of versions 47 and 48 in the lenny and sid
packages and in a self built version of the sid package so I presume the
build system is already taking steps to control the classfile version
and am closing this as a false positive. reopen if you disagree.
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:31:20 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line re: groovy: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503779,
regarding groovy: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
This
Accepted:
classpath-common-unzipped_0.97.2-1.1_all.deb
to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-common-unzipped_0.97.2-1.1_all.deb
classpath-common_0.97.2-1.1_all.deb
to pool/main/c/classpath/classpath-common_0.97.2-1.1_all.deb
classpath-doc_0.97.2-1.1_all.deb
to
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:17:14 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#267040: fixed in classpath 2:0.97.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #267040,
regarding remote code execution hole due to lack of Java security manager
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:17:14 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#267040: fixed in classpath 2:0.97.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #267040,
regarding gcjwebplugin: no mention of non-active security manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you
18 matches
Mail list logo
