Accepted:
clojure_0.0.20090320.dfsg-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/clojure/clojure_0.0.20090320.dfsg-1.diff.gz
clojure_0.0.20090320.dfsg-1.dsc
to pool/main/c/clojure/clojure_0.0.20090320.dfsg-1.dsc
clojure_0.0.20090320.dfsg-1_all.deb
to pool/main/c/clojure/clojure_0.0.20090320.dfsg-1_all.deb
Not sure if this is still the same, but since moving to jsvc, stdin and
stdout have been redirected to syslog, so the logging shouldn't be going
catalina.out and catalina.err, so shouldn't get anywhere as large and
shouldn't need rotating. I think this isn't really relevant to tomcat5.5
or
This is fixed in tomcat5.5 (and tomcat6)
--
David Pashley
da...@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Tomcat5.5 (and 6) start up fine without the webapps package installed.
--
David Pashley
da...@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Mar 21, 2009 at 23:09, Marco Rodrigues praised the llamas by saying:
Hi!
Could someone look at tomcat5 bugs, to see if at least some of them applies to
5.5 or 6 ? After that I can close all the bugs from it.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=yessrc=tomcat5
Tomcat5.5 and tomcat6 use jsvc.
--
David Pashley
da...@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Tomcat 5.5 (and tomcat6) start fine without the webapps package
installed.
--
David Pashley
da...@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
This got fixed in tomcat5.5 and tomcat6. from
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/tomcat5.5/debian/tomcat5.5.init?op=filerev=0sc=0:
# Clean up and set permissions on required files
find $CATALINA_BASE/temp/ -mindepth 1 -exec rm -fr {}
--
David Pashley
da...@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de
Package: doxia
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
A new upstream release [1] of Doxia as been released on 08/03/2009.
Upstream assume complete backward compatibility [2] for this new release.
It's needed for packaging Maven 1.1.
Anyone working on this ?
[1] http://maven.apache.org/doxia/whatsnew-1.1.html
Package: libdoxia-sitetools-java
Version: 1.0-alpha-11-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
libdoxia-sitetools-java is uninstallable in a sid chroot :
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libdoxia-sitetools-java: Conflicts: libdoxia-java (= 1.0-alpha-7-1) but 1.0-
alpha-7-1 is to be installed
E:
Hello,
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ - is that project dead? I hope not :)
Any response is welcome, thanks.
Regards
Dominik Smatana
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dominik Smatana dominik.smat...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to join Debian Java Packaging Project team.
My Alioth
Hi,
I've successfuly built doxia-sitetools 1.0-alpha-11-3 in a sid chroot using
two packages from experimental :
* libmodello-java 1.0-alpha-21-1
* libdoxia-java 1.0-alpha-11-2
I think those packages should be uploaded to unstable since Lenny is now
released.
Cheers,
--
Damien
Hi Dominik,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dominik Smatana
dominik.smat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to join Debian Java Packaging Project team.
My Alioth account: dominik-guest
welcome! I have added you to the project.
Cheers,
Torsten
___
[Dominik Smatana]
Hello,
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ - is that project dead? I hope not :)
Any response is welcome, thanks.
The number of commits seem to indicate it is not quite dead yet. I
hoped some of the other project admins would add you, but will try to
get it done tomorrow
Hi Petter,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
The number of commits seem to indicate it is not quite dead yet. I
hoped some of the other project admins would add you, but will try to
get it done tomorrow unless someone betas me to it.
I have added
15 matches
Mail list logo
